Page 109 - Modular design for machine tools
P. 109

Engineering Guides and Future Perspectives of Modular  Design    73

                 In modular design, a  two-dimensional decision table is another effective
               tool, in which two dominant design factors are allocated to the vertical and
               horizontal axes, e.g., versatility of structural configuration and machining
               capability, e.g., power, stiffness and metal removal, as shown for the case
               of a planomiller of TOS make (Czechoslovakia) in Fig. 2-5. In this case, the
               machining capacity within the same structure can be varied by the output
               power of the main motor; also the type variety can be extended by adding
               the milling head of ram type to that of quill type. As a simple method, an
               one-dimensional table is helpful in rationally managing the design, as
               shown in Fig. 2-6, where the structure of the milling machine is reinforced
               by the overarm and stay, and furthermore the auxiliary  column.
                 Having in mind these predecessors, Brankamp and Herrmann pro-
               posed furthermore the idea of a function chain (das Funktionskette),
               shown in Fig. 2-7, for its ease in finding suitable combinations of the
               modules. Importantly, the functions that must be provided and the mod-
               ules, e.g., units, functional complexes, and parts, that can be possibly
               realized are allocated in the  two-dimensional table. The structural con-
               figuration can be generated by choosing the suitable module from a group
               of the modules, which are allocated in every line in the table, showing a
               zigzag choice trajectory, i.e., chain. On this topic, Dietz proposed two sim-
               ilar ideas called structure (der Baukasten)-structural entity (die Baureihe)
               and connecting diagram (das Verknupfungs- Diagramm) [11]. These facil-
               itate the estimation of possible variants that can be produced from a
               group of modules. In the work of Dietz, the row shows the unit and unit
               complex in the order of assembly, as seen in Fig. 2-8. It can thus be inter-
               preted as a predecessor of the design methodology proposed by Lee
               et al. [12], in which the connecting diagram is represented by the direct
               graph for ease of computer processing. In addition, that of Dietz can be





                 Increased strength










                                         Increased versatility
                 In case of planomiller of  TOS make (maximum clamping width of table 1600 mm; spindle drive
                 power approximately 10, 20, and 40 HP).
               Figure 2-5    Two- dimensional decision table for modular design.
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114