Page 441 - Book Hosokawa Nanoparticle Technology Handbook
P. 441

7.4 REMOVAL OF NANOPARTICLES                                                 FUNDAMENTALS
                  the diffusive back transport of particle. Thus, the per-  ×  10 3
                  meate flux u is given by                          5
                            1
                                                                        p = 98 kPa
                                      ⎛ C   C ⎞                     4                    Downward Upward
                                u   ln ⎜  m  p  ⎟       (7.4.3)                          filtration  filtration
                                    k
                                 1
                                      ⎝  C    C p ⎠                                                Silica sol -3
                                         b
                                                                  (s/cm)  3                        s = 5×10
                                                                                                   BSA
                  where C p is the particle concentration in the permeate,                         s = 1×10 -3
                  k ( D/ ) the mass transfer coefficient, and D the dif-  d /d   2
                  fusion coefficient.
                    The osmotic pressure model assumes that the devi-
                  ation from pure water flux occurs solely due to the  1
                  osmotic pressure difference across the membrane, and
                  thus the permeate flux u is given by
                                     1
                                                                    0
                                                                     0        0.5      1.0      1.5      2.0
                                                                                        3
                                                                                           2

                                  p  {( C )    C (    )}                           v (cm /cm )
                              u =       m      p        (7.4.4)
                              1
                                          R m                    Figure 7.4.9
                                                                 Permeate flux in dead-end upward ultrafiltration of silica
                  where   is the osmotic pressure, which is a function of  sol and BSA solution.
                  the concentration. Equation (7.4.4) means that the
                  effective driving force across the clean membrane is
                  p { (C )  (C )}. Replacing p { (C )   (C )} by
                         m
                                                        p
                                                 m
                               p
                  the hydraulic pressure at the membrane surface, p ,  dead-end inclined filtration, where the membrane is
                                                           m
                  equation (7.4.4) reduces to the cake filtration equation.   inclined, can reduce the cake formation onto the
                                                                 membrane in UF of nanoparticulate suspension and
                    7.4.3.2 Techniques for controlling membrane fouling  protein solutions. In upward UF of silica sol (mean
                  To minimize the effects of cake buildup and concen-  diameter 6.2 nm) and BSA solution, a sustained
                  tration polarization, membrane filtration is usually  permeate flux is achieved, as shown in Fig. 7.4.9
                  conducted using the cross-flow geometry in which the  [19, 20], because the filter cake overlying the mem-
                  feed flow is parallel to the membrane and perpendi-  brane is exfoliated continuously under the gravita-
                  cular to the filtrate flow [8]. However, especially in  tional force acting on the particles comprising the
                  MF the energy requirements associated with pumping  filter cake.
                  the feed (plus any recirculation flow) along the mem-
                  brane surface are typically very high. Thus, there have  7.4.3.3 Hybrid operation with membrane filtration
                  been some innovations in recent years with cakeless  Another approach for enhancing the permeate flux is
                  filtration.                                    to employ external force fields. Electrofiltration, in
                    The rotating disk module in which the membrane  which an applied electric field is used to drive
                  disk is stationary is suited for large-scale operation [9].  charged particles away from the membrane surface,
                  It is possible to enhance the permeate flux by using the  has been developed. In electrofiltration, the accumu-
                  vibrating modules [10, 11]. In the rotating cylinder  lation of the particles on the membrane surface is lim-
                  device with the membrane on the inner rotating cylin-  ited by the imposed electrophoretic force. In addition,
                  der, counter-rotating Taylor vortices within the annular  the permeate flux through the filter cake is dramati-
                  gap are available [12, 13]. Dean vortices that twist and  cally enhanced due to electroosmosis as a secondary
                  spiral in the direction of flow inside a highly curved  electrokinetic phenomenon.  This method can be
                  channel, similar to vortices in rotary modules can  applied to a broad combination ranging from MF of
                  result in enhanced flux [14]. These vortices, or flow  particulate suspension such as bentonite [21] to UF of
                  instabilities, induce turbulence into the system.  protein solution. Fig. 7.4.10 shows the reciprocal per-
                    Periodic removal of the formed filter cake is also  meate flux (d /dv) versus the permeate volume per
                  effective for enhancing the permeate flux. Recently,  unit membrane area,  v, for various values of the
                  several methods have been investigated: back washing  strength of the DC electric field, E [22]. The steady
                  using the filtrate or air pressurization [15], periodic  permeate flux increases noticeably with the magni-
                  rotation of the cylindrical membrane [16], pulsatile  tude of the imposed field strength.  Also, a higher
                  flow [17], high-frequency transmembrane pressure  electric field strength causes the permeate flux to
                  pulsing with a frequency around 0.1–1 Hz [18].  equilibrate more rapidly.
                    Dead-end upward filtration, where the filtrate  A method has been developed for removing
                  flow is in the opposite direction to gravity, and  humic substances by hybrid UF combined with both

                                                                                                        415
   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446