Page 158 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 158

MODELLING OF GROUND WAVES 139
                          Finite element and infinite element models
            This  section  contains  a  preliminary  verification  of  the  capability  of  the  chosen
            elements to give a faithful representation of primary, P, shear, S, and Rayleigh, R,
            waves.  Infinite  elements  are  then  assessed  for  their  performance  in  limiting  or
            eliminating  reflected  waves,  and  the  simultaneous  limit  of  P,  S  and  R-wave
            reflection  at  the  model  boundaries.  The  multi-stage  models  for  impact  and
            for  vibratory  driving  are  then  explained  in  detail.  All  computational  analyses
            were undertaken using the Abaqus (1999) suite.

                                    Element verification

            The normal choice for axisymmetric analysis is the 8-noded quadrilateral, which
            is most effective when its aspect ratio is close to unity. For transient analysis, a
            suitable mesh will have some 10 nodes per wavelength, and the time-step interval
            should meet the stability criterion of ≥ x=c≥ t, where ≥ x is the mesh spacing, c is
            the wave transmission velocity and ≥ t is the time step. Around the boundaries of
            the FE mesh it is necessary to include infinite elements, which contain 5 nodes to
            be compatible with the 8-noded quadrilateral, Figure 5.5. The normal mesh used
            for the soil half-space comprised a 50×50 mesh of 1 m×1 m square axisymmetric
            FEs, with a surround of IEs on the outer vertical and base-horizontal boundaries.
              These elements were tested for purity of transmission of P, S and R waves and
            for limitation of wave reflection (Ramshaw et al. 1998a). Consider the P-wave
            test.  A  small  mesh  of  FEs  was  set  up  in  plane-strain,  with  constrained  vertical
            movement  at  top  and  bottom  boundaries,  and  a  compressive  sine  wave  was
            imposed  at  each  end  of  the  mesh  with  appropriate  time  delay,  based  on  the
            transmission velocity c  of
                              p

                                                                         (5.4)


            where G is shear modulus, λ is a Lame constant and ρ is density.
              A  pure  sine  wave  was  observed.  The  right-hand  boundary  was  then  meshed
            into infinite elements, and again a pure sine wave was observed, see Figure 5.6.
              The  geometric  attenuation  of  the  P-wave  was  studied  by  imposing  a
            compressive  sine  wave  on  a  plane  strain  model,  an  axisymmetric  mesh,  and  a
            spherical  expansion.  The  plane  strain  showed  negligible  attenuation,  the
            axisymmetric mesh gave attenuation of peak displacement proportional to 1/≥ r,
            while amplitudes in spherical expansion were proportional to 1/r, in accordance
            with standard wave theory (Ramshaw et al. 1998b), where r is distance from the
            source.
              Tests on S-wave generation and transmission were similar to those for the P-
            wave, but with modified top and bottom boundary restraints, and with imposed
            sinusoidal shear-waves, based on transmission velocity c  of
                                                         s
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163