Page 50 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 50

COMPRESSED AIR TUNNELLING 31
            of tunnelling or surface conditions. Furthermore, they do not predict the zone of
            influence of the air leakage, which is crucial when tunnelling in urban areas.



                             Deficiencies of the current practice


            Although  there  has  been  extensive  use  of  this  tunnelling  method  there  is  no
            theoretically rigorous method for predicting how the air, water and soil interact.
            For example, seepage of water into the tunnel can result in groundwater lowering
            and settlement, over-pressuring can cause ground heave, high air pressures or
            large quantities of air can fracture or disturb the soil and reduce its strength. Also,
            the  air  can  travel  laterally  to  adjacent  excavations.  Records  of  the  Dartford
                  10
            Tunnel  refer to high air losses issuing 800 m from the face and a blow-out 100
            m from the face. These situations are of immediate concern to those constructing
            the  tunnel,  but  the  threat  to  deep  excavations  supported  by  temporary  works,
            dewatering  projects,  basements,  cuttings,  other  tunnels  and  surface  structures
            must also be considered.
              An  appropriate  air  pressure  must  be  applied  in  the  tunnel  to  balance  the
            groundwater  pressure  and,  due  to  leakage  of  air  from  the  tunnel,  a  constant
            recharge  of  air  must  be  supplied  to  maintain  that  pressure.  If  air  leakage
            increases, a greater volume of air must be supplied or measures taken to reduce
            the air losses. However, in its most simplistic form, compressed air as a means of
            groundwater  control  is  justified  on  the  premise  that  if  the  air  pressure  in  the
            tunnel is equal to the pressure of the water in the ground, a state of equilibrium
            should be created (see Figure 2.2).
              Figure  2.2  shows  the  relative  pressures  for  an  air  pressure  set  equal  to  the
            water pressure at the tunnel invert level. The resulting over-pressure at the tunnel
            crown, P , is the difference between the two pressures. As long as there is no
                   r
            significant flow of water towards the tunnel face, the ground should achieve a
            satisfactory effective strength for stability at air pressures less than the full head
            of water.
              As well as changing the effective stress conditions, there can be a secondary
            positive  effect  of  reducing  ground  settlement.  The  air  pressure  provides  a
            support to the tunnel face and walls.
              However, it is common for layers of soil with different geological origins and
            properties  to  be  encountered  in  driving  tunnels.  This  inhomogenity  is
            compounded  by  the  flow  of  air  through  the  ground,  which  may  cause  some
            changes in the structure, state of stress, properties and the strength of the soil.
            Also a region of the soil is dewatered by the air flow, so the properties of the soil
            in this region will be different to those in the saturated soil. These conditions
            result in a very complex geotechnical environment.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55