Page 361 - Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineering
P. 361

350     7 Probability theory and stochastic simulation



                                              †
                   If we define the adjoint operator L such that
                                              t
                          +∞                         +∞
                        '                          '
                                                              †
                             [L t F(x)]p(t, x|t , x )dx =  F(x)[L p(t, x|t , x )]dx  (7.194)
                                                              t
                         −∞                         −∞
                   then (7.193) becomes
                        +∞                          +∞      ∂
                       '                          '
                                 †
                            F(x)[L p(t, x|t , x )]dx =  F(x)  p(t, x|t , x ) dx      (7.195)
                                 t
                        −∞                         −∞       ∂t
                   and hence the transition probability distribution is governed by the forward Kolmogorov
                   equation
                                          ∂
                                                         †




                                            p(t, x|t , x ) = L p(t, x|t , x )        (7.196)
                                                         t
                                         ∂t
                   For the operator (7.186), one can show by integration by parts that
                                               ∂         1 ∂  2
                                         †                          2
                                        L =−     a(t, x) +    [b(t, x)]              (7.197)
                                         t
                                               ∂x        2 ∂x 2
                   and thus
                                                        2
                          ∂                ∂         1 ∂        2




                           p(t, x|t , x ) = −  a(t, x) +  [b(t, x)]  p(t, x|t , x )  (7.198)
                         ∂t                ∂x        2 ∂x 2
                   Using the relation
                                               '
                                                 +∞




                                       p(t, x) =    p(t, x|t , x )p(t , x )dx        (7.199)
                                                −∞
                   wemultiply(7.198)by p(t , x )andintegrateoverall x toobtaintheFokker–Planckequation



                   for p(t, x),
                             ∂p      ∂               1 ∂ 2       2
                                =−     [a(t, x)p(t, x)] +  {[b(t, x)] p(t, x)}       (7.200)
                             ∂t     ∂x               2 ∂x 2
                   For 1-D Brownian motion with the SDE (7.152),
                                              1    dU             2
                             a(t, x) = J c (x) =−           [b(t, x)] = 2D           (7.201)
                                              ζ  dx
                   the Fokker–Planck equation is
                                     ∂p      ∂               ∂ 2
                                        =−     [J c (x)p(t, x)] +  {Dp(t, x)}        (7.202)
                                     ∂t     ∂x              ∂x 2
                   This looks somewhat like a convection/diffusion equation, where the first term is the con-
                   vective flux due to the presence of the external potential and the second term is the diffusion
                   caused by the random Brownian motion. If we have a system of N noninteracting particles,
                   each governed by an independent SDE (7.152), the concentration field of the particles is
                   c(t, x) = Np(t, x) and is governed by
                                      ∂c     ∂               ∂  2
                                        =−     [J c (x)c(t, x)] +  {Dc(t, x)}        (7.203)
                                      ∂t    ∂x              ∂x 2
                   Thus, we see that there is a strong relationship between macroscopic diffusion and micro-
                   scopic Brownian motion.
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366