Page 145 - Open-Hole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation

_
Le
de
be
the
the
The
lar
for
and
fluid
Morris,
Goetz,
with
Archie,
Graton,
Tech.
Coates,
Gas J.
a
(Parts
Leverett,
ky
J.
=
J.
Bobek,
R.
Witte,
Jakarta.
Blane,
1
L.
Bateman,
Bradley,
J.
Rocks,”
G.
G.
basic
M.
February
formation
Honarpour,
R.
F.,
R.
L.,
L:
&
Reservoir
C.,
S.:
Estimating
SUMMARY
Ch,
R.,
Fresh
Relation
May
Significance
C.:
(April
Symposium,
Molina, Nelson
conceptually
wireline-tool
J.,
M.:
estimated.
M.,
(/k,
By
Porosity,”
and
to
Permeability,”
free-water
2),
1980)
Prins,
Oil and
Sr.:
hs
BIBLIOGRAPHY
and
E., Mattax,
E.: “The
conduction
1977.
distribution
(December
1983).
J. Pet.
C.
21,
“Relations
tht
SPWLA
W. J.,
of
similar
level,
Gas
Two-Phase
Spherical-Grain
and
Formation
“Capillary
1/k,
Biggs, W.
Koederitz,
1982).
relationships
8th
to
Tech.
and
24-32.
L.
+
P.:
Electrical
and Fraser, H. J.:
the
Porosity and
and Dumanoir,
J.
Characteristics,” j.
flow
irreducible water saturation.
ko
F.,
Evaluation,”
the
measurements
L.:
J. (August
Relative
between
“Distribution
electric
in
(July
New Orleans, June
Waters,”
Pet.
Annual
Behavior
a
“A
1/By
and
24,
Logar,
Onion-Skin
in
porosity, permeability,
length
flow
C., and Denekas,
and
Trans.,
J. F.:
Resistivity
1977),
10-13,
established
M.
Tech.
“Systematic
paper
of
of
and
Logging
current
1950).
O.:
Harvey,
Log
by
Porous
AIME
EE,
Resistivities
UR,
reservoir,
Permeability
the
Permeability,” J.
1984.
Model,”
of formation
A.
as
fluid
fluid
(1942).
in
776-804.
Continuity

Packing
an
and
the
New Approach
/n.
H.:
“Reservoir
The Log Analyst January-February
Geol.
The
of
of
(1958)
Archie
Solids,”
through
SPWLA
Aid
Fluid
“Using Log-Derived Values
‘a
in
Log
through
213,
1974)
transition
25th
analyst
with
(1935)
saturation.
Trans.,
Symposium, June
conductivity
“Empirical
15,
the
Consolidated
43,
:
Sandstone
/
the
Delineation
may
are
Contents
Analyst
zone,
porous
AIME
Annual
155-160.
11-14,
N.: “Systematic Approach Aids Reservoir Simulation,”
Spheres—With
17-29.
rock.
Determining
and
Rock,” J.
Equations
785-909.
physics
rock
related
/
1967.
(1941).
of Water Saturation
Pet.
Particu-
Reservoirs”
Techniques,” 6th Annual Convention of the Indonesia Petroleum Association,
by Wireline
to Improved Log-Derived
Some
the
“Fluid and Electrical Formation Conductivity Factors Calculated
of Porous
Logging
for
““Watercut Prediction from Logs Run in Feldspathic Sandstone
QJanuary-
From these parameters, productivity can
Oil and
“Reservoir Rock Wettability—Its
determine
is
Thus,
to
By combining
of
°

" Its Evaluation,” Producers Monthly (April and L. E., and Archer, S$. Raza, H., Treiber, CCC, SPWLA 25th Annual paper Distribution, Pore Throat Size and By)" = P. M.: Raymer, L. L., and Freeman, - the geometric average: For random flow use Permeability Relationships,” oo + Ry L. L.: Raymer, the harmonic a
Tixier,
210.
Timur,
Wyllie,
from
M.
A.:
M.
Rockwood,
Saturation
Parameters
Gradients,”
S.
P.:
Schlumberger:
Schlumberger:
Schlumberger:
Guly-August
“An
R. J.,
Electrical
H.,
and
“Log
“Log
“Log
Log
1968)
Defined
Lair,
9,
by
G.
Relationship
“Evaluation
Oil and Gas
Rose, W.
Investigation
Data,” J.
H.,
for
of
8-17.”
of
D.:
Pet.
Interpretation
Interpretation
j. June
Interpretation:
Capillary
and
16,
“Some
Tech.
Charts,”
Sandstone
Volume
1949)
Permeability
Permeability,
Principles,”
(April
48,
1977.
from
Theoretical
1969.
1950)
113.
Porosity,
Reservoirs,”
189,
1—Principles,”
and
The
Electric-Log
1972.
Log
105-108.
Considérations

Residual
. Studies,” Trans. AIME (1957) Pressure Volumetric Langford, B. J.: “Reservoit 1968). Rocks L: “Wettability of Reservoir D. 10-13, 1984." Logging Symposium, June Data,” from. Wireline and Permeability of Capillary Pressure, In-Situ Determination 1981) 3-7. The Log Analyst. (May-June “Elevation and Hydrocarbon Density Correct

Related
Water
tothe Quantitative Evaluation of the Physical Characteristics of Reservoir Rock
Resistivity
Analyst
i