Page 327 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 327

306                                                 PART 3      Managing with the MRP System


        and the basis on which MRP was developed is to first plan the priorities of the enterprise
        and then to confirm the capacity availability.
             Figure 18-1 shows the difference between the bills of material (BOMs) from a tra-
        ditional MRP plant and those from the process industry. The traditional MRP schedul-
        ing logic is used in the “A” plant, whereas the process plant is exactly the opposite, or a
        “V” plant.
             The MRP logic would have a difficult time managing all the by-products and co-
        products if all process plants were only “V” type plants. By-products are materials of
        value that are produced as a residue of the production process. For example, in an injec-
        tion-molding operation, the material used to hold the part in the die is called a gate. These
        gates are removed as the part is removed from the injection mold and collected.
        Customarily, this material then is reground and stocked as regrind. The regrind is blend-
        ed with the virgin material to mold more parts. The percentage of regrind that can be
        used optimally by part and by specific component material will change. However, the
        ability to use regrind dramatically reduces the cost of manufacturing these parts.
             Co-products are products that are typically manufactured together or sequentially
        because of product or process similarities. This could include grouping parts of many dif-
        ferent sizes and shapes to be cut from one piece of material to optimize material use. This
        is called nesting in discrete production. In corrugated-box plants, different customer orders
        may be run as co-products to maximize use of the corrugated web. In process plants, such
        as chemical and refining plants, operations are the result of very complex stoichiometric
        models. These models use process conditions or are controlled by raw material quality,



           FIGURE 18-1
                                                  Standard MRP Scheduling Logic: The “A” Plant
           Standard MRP
           versus PFS bills                    Cut        Cure
           of material.         Composite
                                 Material                           Bond
                                                                                  Bin
                                                          Trim
                                                                                Assemble
                                                                   Assemble
                                  Glue
                                                         Fabricate
                                  Metal
                                  Other
                               Components
                                                                                     Finish
                               “V” Plant: The Basis of PFS Scheduling Logic
                                                                  Drying
                                                     Whole
                                          Market                  Fall Down
                                  Trees   Price      Cut
                                                                  Grind
                                                     Chips
                                                                  Pulp
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332