Page 336 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 336

C HAP TE R 19


             Repetitive Manufacturing

             Application
















        Unlike the traditional process of a master schedule netting gross to net requirements
        through to a detailed material plan, the repetitive manufacturer needs to perform rate-
        based material planning supported by rate-based parts delivery schedules. In some com-
        panies, this rate-based schedule must be tied to a mixed-model-sequenced line for items
        going to finished goods or may require traceability to a customer order. Processing indi-
        vidual work orders either by the practitioner or under the software covers by the com-
        puter does not add value. Rather than detailed job-order costing, the variance in expect-
        ed versus actual output rates over time is a key performance measure. A key measure is
        linearity, which expects that each day has a consistent output. Some companies will mea-
        sure each hour of output. This linearity of output provides key insight into the overall
        effectiveness of the process. Product costing changes to a four-wall-period approach
        rather than performing detailed issue transactions to a work order. This process control
        approach is quite similar to the process industry, as discussed in Chapter 18.


        GENERAL REPETITIVE APPLICATION

        A repetitive manufacturer makes high-volume products in low variety. Most commonly,
        this type of manufacturer competes in the market based on price and/or lead-time
        response. The manufacturing strategy used to meet the market is usually make to stock,
        configure to order, or assemble to order. The ability to promise delivery to the customer
        accurately is very important for the repetitive manufacturer. Less important is the ability
        to track costs to a specific production unit. Costs are considered over a period of time
        rather than for a particular unit, similar to process industry. Bills of material (BOMs) have
        relatively few levels, and routings are fixed and reliable. This is a very different environ-
        ment from the traditional discrete job shop for which material requirements planning
        (MRP) was developed. Discrete job shops have a wide variety of potential routings,


                                                                                        315
   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341