Page 338 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 338

CHAPTER 19   Repetitive Manufacturing Application                               317


        of inputs is balanced with the flow of outputs, the overall level in the river stays constant.
        The water level in the river reflects the lead time through the plant and the inventory in
        the operation. Since the lead time for a repetitive manufacturer is so short, the work-in-
        process is very low. Critical feedback processes for the repetitive enterprise include the
        ability to report production-rate variances in addition to the expected cost variances.
             The repetitive sequential operations are directly related to each other, so if one oper-
        ation stops, the balance of the line soon stops. Piles of inventory are not allowed to build
        up between operations. This stable level of work-in-process simplifies the control and
        reporting systems. True repetitive systems have rate-based production scheduling and
        backflushing capability. This backflushing can occur at a pay point partially through the
        routing or simply at the end of the process. The system does not create work orders in the
        background. When a job shop system attempts to masquerade as a repetitive system, this
        background creation of work orders is common practice. The creation and processing of
        work orders in the background can consume a great deal of computer power and pro-
        cessing time.
             High volumes and very low variety characterize the repetitive product. The raw
        materials needed are repetitious in quantity and timing. The end items are still discrete
        but are produced in a very short cycle time, typically less than one day. Management of
        this type of operation turns to balancing the capacity along the line rather than planning
        detailed routings. The BOMs tend to be very flat. This means that they have very few lev-
        els. Routings are simple, with only one or two steps, because the operations are closely
        coupled with each other. The entire line is either running or not. The option of having
        some work centers working while others are idle is not common in this environment.
        Costs for this type of operation are easy to allocate directly to these focused lines.
             The four-wall approach is used to track inventory. Receipts are transacted when the
        product arrives, and deductions are made to the inventory when the final product leaves.
        Intermediate tracking does not add value to the process, only cost, so such tracking is not
        done. The traditional intermediate tracking is no longer required because the materials
        are in process only for a very short period of time.


        KANBAN
        Just-in-time (JIT) execution tools are used to bring materials to the line very close to the
        time of need, as in kanban. In actuality, kanban is a Japanese word that literally means
        “sign board.”  According to the  American Production and Inventory Control Society
        (APICS), a kanban is a “method of just-in-time production that uses standard containers
        or lot sizes with a single card attached to each. It is a pull system in which work centers
        signal with a card that they wish to withdraw parts from feeding operations or suppliers.
        This is also known as a move card, production card, or synchronized production.” Figure 19-1
        shows the actual Japanese kanji characters for a kanban system.
             A kanban can be a light that signals replenishment, a card that is moved, an empty
        container that is sent to the supplier to be filled when the active one is empty, or even a
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343