Page 355 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 355

334                                                 PART 3      Managing with the MRP System


           FIGURE 20-4

           S&OP change                                   Strategic
           model.              Annual Change             Planning             Annual Change

                                                         Business
                                                         Planning
                                                        Annual Budget





                                                          S&OP


                                                         Tactical
                                 Change                  Planning                       Change


                                                        Operational
                                                         Planning




        their own functional agenda was virtually impossible. Very often the one who shouted
        loudest got his or her way, but if finance did not agree, the number was questionable.
             In fact, this obsession with one number was seen as the Holy Grail and S&OP as the
        great unifier—the way to get a single number. Why? Because multiple sets of numbers cre-
        ate confusion. They do, but the antidote is not a single number. What is needed is an
        agreed-on latest view that comes as a result of reconciliation of different views (see next
        section). In a traditional pre-S&OP meeting in an organization with a silo culture, there
        was no recognition that different views add value—they were considered an obstacle to a
        decision. In such organizations, one can see the politics. What is said in a meeting is influ-
        enced by functional positioning. It influences where and when things are said, by whom,
        to whom, and against whom. It is impossible to harness all the ability and knowledge of
        all participants to obtain the optimal agreed-on latest view in such an environment.
             This culture is often reinforced by the A versus B syndrome. The symptoms of this
        are polarity and argument around two different options when creation of a third or
        fourth option may well be the best solution. Here, verbal dexterity in support of one or
        criticizing the other absorbs all the talent and time. Often whoever is fastest on his or her
        feet with the best information or examples in support wins for A versus B—even if more
        considered thought would produce the opposite and conclude that B is better and even
        a solution where an undeveloped C or D would be better still.
             Some reconciliation of different views must take place before there is agreement on
        what a number should be. We should have seen that S&OP must be the great reconciler
        before it could be a unifier.
   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360