Page 143 - Partition & Adsorption of Organic Contaminants in Environmental Systems
P. 143

134   CONTAMINANT SORPTION TO SOILS AND NATURAL SOLIDS

                                                      V
           TABLE 7.4. Water Solubilities (S w), Molar Volumes ( ), Octanol–Water Partition
           Coefficients (K ow), and K om Values of Some Substituted Benzenes and
           Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) on Woodburn Soil
                                      a
                                  logS w      V
           Compound              (mol/L)   (L/mol)   logS w V  logK om   logK ow
           Benzene                -1.64     0.0894    -2.69     1.26      2.13
           Anisole                -1.85     0.109     -2.82     1.30      2.11
           Chlorobenzene          -2.36     0.102     -3.35     1.68      2.84
           Ethylbenzene           -2.84     0.123     -3.75     1.98      3.15
           1,2-Dichlorobenzene    -2.98     0.113     -3.98     2.27      3.38
           1,3-Dichlorobenzene    -3.04     0.114     -3.98     2.23      3.38
           1,4-Dichlorobenzene    (-3.03)   0.118     -3.96     2.20      3.39
           1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene  -3.57    0.125     -4.47     2.70      4.02
           2-PCB                  (-4.57)   0.174     -5.33     3.23      4.51
           2,2¢-PCB               (-5.08)   0.189     -5.57     3.68      4.80
           2,4¢-PCB               (-5.28)   0.189     -5.97     3.89      5.10
           2,4,4¢-PCB             (-5.98)   0.204     -6.67     4.38      5.62
           Source: Data from Chiou et al. (1983).
           a
            Values at 20 to 25°C. The numbers in parentheses are the supercooled liquid solubilities esti-
           mated according to Eqs. (3.9) and (3.25) with DH ¯ fus/T m = 56.5J/mol·K.





                      6



                                              °
                    Log K om                         V _
                      4


                                    Ideal line (log K om  = – log S w    – 0.622)
                      2




                      0
                             -7            -5    _      -3           -1
                                           Log S    V
                                                w
           Figure 7.13 Plot of logK om versus logS w V  for substituted aromatic compounds in
           Table 7.4. [Data from Chiou et al. (1983). Reproduced with permission.]
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148