Page 143 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 143

6H 20 Incorrect Operations Index
           A2.  MOP potential (0-12 pts)               fairly rapidly due  to  incompressible fluid or rapid  intro-
                                                       duction of relatively high volumes of compressible fluids.
           The possibility of exceeding the pressure for which the system   Overpressure is prevented only by procedure or single-level
           was designed is an element of the risk picture. Obviously, a sys-   safety device.
           tem where it is not  physically possible to exceed the design   B.  Unlikely   5 pts
           pressure  is  inherently safer than  one  where the  possibility   Definition: Where overpressure can occur through a combina-
           exists. This often occurs when a pipeline system is operated at   tion of procedural errors or omissions, and failure of safety
           levels well below its original design intent. This is a relatively   devices (at least two levels of safety). For example, a pump
           common occurrence as pipeline  systems change  service or   running  in  a  “deadheaded”  condition  by  the  accidental
           ownership  or as throughputs turn out to be less than intended.   closing of a valve, and two levels of safety system (a primary
            The ease with  which  design limits might be  exceeded is   safety and one redundant level of safety) failing, would over-
           assessed here. The first things required for this assessment are   pressure the pipeline.
           knowledge of the source pressure bump, compressor, connect-   C.  Extremely Unlikely   10 pts
           ing pipelines, tank, well, etc.) and knowledge of the system   Definition:  Where  overpressure  is  theoretically  possible
           strength. Then  the  evaluator must  determine the  ease with   (sufficient source pressure), but only through an extremely
           which an overpressure event could occur. Would it take only the   unlikely  chain  of  events  including  errors,  omissions,  and
           inadvertent closure of one valve to rapidly build a pressure that   safety device failures at more than two levels of redundancy.
           is too high? Or would it take many hours and many missed   For  example, a  large diameter gas line would  experience
           opportunities before pressure levels were raised to a dangerous   overpressure if a mainline valve were closed and communi-
           level?                                      cations (SCADA) failed and downstream vendors did not
             Structural failure can be defined (in a simplified way) as the   communicate problems and  local safety shutdowns failed,
           point at which the material changes shape under stress and does   and  the  situation went  undetected for a  matter of  hours.
           not return to its original form when the stress is removed. When   Obviously, this is an unlikely scenario.
           this “inelastic” limit is reached,  the material has been  struc-   D.  Impossible   12 pts
           turally altered from its original form and its remaining strength   Definition:  Where  the  pressure  source  cannot,  under  any
           might have changed as a result. The structure’s ability to resist   conceivable chain of events, overpressure the pipeline.
           inelastic deformation is one important measure of its strength.
             The most readily available measure of a pipeline’s strength   In studying the point schedule for ease of reaching MOP, the
           will normally be the documented maximum operating pressure   “routine” description implies that MOP can be reached rather
           or MOP. The MOP is the theoretical maximum internal pres-   easily. The only preventive measure may be procedural, where
           sure to which the pipeline can be subjected, reduced by appro-   the operator is relied on to operate 100% error free, or a simple
           priate safety factors. The safety factors allow for uncertainties   safety device that is designed to close a valve, shut down a pres-
           in material properties and construction. MOP is determined   sure source, or relieve pressure from the pipeline.
           from stress calculations, with internal pressure normally caus-   If perfect operator performance and one safety device are
           ing the largest stresses in the wall of the pipe. Material stress   relied on, the pipeline owner is accepting a high level of risk of
           limits are theoretical values, confirmed (or at least evidenced)   reaching MOP. Error-free work techniques are not realistic and
           by testing, that predict the point at which the material will fail   industry experience shows that reliance on a single safety shut-
           when subjected to hgh stress.              down device, either mechanical or electronic, allows for some
             External forces also add stress to the pipe. These external   periods of no overpressure protection. Few points should be
           stresses can be caused by the weight of the soil over a buried   awarded to such situations.
           line, the weight of the pipe itself when it is unsupported, tem-   Note that the evaluator is making no value judgments at this
           perature changes, etc. In general, any external influence that   stage as to whether or not reaching MOP poses a serious threat
           tries to change the shape of the pipe will cause a stress. Some of   to life or property. Such judgments will be made when the “con-
           these stresses are additive to the  stresses caused by  internal   sequence” factor is evaluated.
           pressure. As such, they must be allowed for in the MOP calcula-   The “unlikely” description, category B, implies a pressure
           tions. Hence, care must be taken to ensure that  the pipeline   source that can overpressure the  segment and protection via
           will never be subjected to any combination of internal pressures   redundant levels of safety devices. These may be any combina-
           and  external  forces that  will  cause the  pipe  material to  be   tion of relief valves; rupture disks; mechanical, electrical, or
           overstressed.                              pneumatic shutdown switches; or computer safeties (program-
             Note that MOP limits include safety factors. If pipeline seg-   mable logic controllers, supervisory control and data acquisi-
           ments with different safety factors are being compared, a differ-   tion systems, or any kind of logic devices that may trigger an
           ent  measure  of  pipe  strength  might  be  more  appropriate.   overpressure prevention action). The requirement is that at least
           Appendix C discusses pipe strength calculations.   two  independently operated devices be  available  to prevent
             To define the ease of reaching MOP (whichever definition   overpressure of  the  pipeline. This allows for the  accidental
           of MOP is used) a point schedule can be designed to cover   failure of at least one safety device, with backup provided by
           the  possibilities.  Consider  this  example  point-assignment   another.
           schedule:                                    Operator procedures must also be  in  place to  ensure the
                                                      pipeline is always operated at a pressure level below the MOP.
           A.  Routine                0 pts           In this sense, any safety device can be thought of as a backup to
           Definition: Where  routine,  normal  operations  could  allow   proper operating procedures. The point value  of category B
             the  system  to  reach  MOP.  Overpressure  would  occur   should reflect the chances, relative to the other categories, of a
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148