Page 64 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 64

3/43











                                                Third-party Damage

                                                Index









      k


















            Third-party Damage Index                    Third-party damage, as the term is used here, refers to any acci-
            A.  Minimum Depth of Cover   0-20  pts   20%   dental damage done to the pipe as a result ofactivities ofpersonnel
            B.  Activity Level       0-20pts   20%     not associated with the pipeline. This failure mode is also some-
            C.  Aboveground Facilities   0-10 pts   10%   times called outside force or external force, but those descriptions
            D.  Line Locating        0-15  pts   15%   would presumably include damaging earth movements. We  use
            E.  Public Education Programs   0-15 pts   15%   third-party damage as the descriptor here to focus the analyses
            E  Right-of-way Condition   0-5 pts   5%   specifically on damage caused by people not associated with the
            G.  Patrol Frequency     0-15  pts   15%   pipeline. Potential earth movement damage is addressed in  the
                                                       design index discussion of Chapter 5. Intentional damages are
                                    0-100pts   100%    covered in the sabotage module (Chapter 9). Accidental damages
                                                       done by pipeline personnel and contractors are covered in  the
             This table lists some possible variables and weightings that   incorrect operations index chapter (Chapter  6).
            could be used to assess the potential for third-party damages to   U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) pipeline accident
            atypical transmission pipeline (see Figures 3.1 and 3.2).   statistics indicate that third-party intrusions are often the lead-
                                                       ing  cause  of pipeline  failure.  Some 20 to  40 percent  of all
            Background                                 pipeline  failures  in most time periods are attributed to third-
                                                       party damages.  In  spite  of these  statistics,  the  potential  for
            Pipeline operators usually take steps to reduce the possibility of   third-party damage is often one of the least considered aspects
            damage to their facilities by others. The extent to which miti-   of pipeline hazard assessment.
            gating steps are necessary depends on how readily the system   The good safety record of pipelines has been attributed in
            can be damaged and bow often the chance for damage occurs.   part to their initial installation in sparsely populated areas and
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69