Page 329 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 329

302                                                               Chapter 16


                P(hit)  = 3.105 .180/5542.0.468
                       = 4.6-107/lift
                       = 4.6-107nift.20 lifts/rig day500 rig days/
                       20 yeadtemplate
                       = 4.6.103/20 yeadtemplate
                       = 2.3.104/year/template . 17 templates
                       = 3.9.103/year
           To calculate the probability of a dropped object hitting the flowlines outside the rockdumped
           area, the procedure above is repeated considering the cone section between the end of  the
           rockdump and the end of the 99% cone area, giving:
               A‘,  = ‘II.. (173.2’  - 133’)ln  = 38670 m’
               A’f = 3 . (173.2-133) . lm = 120.6 m2 (length of pipe & umbilical within A, with a lm
               corridor)
           Probability of hit within A’=:
               133 m167.2 m = 1.979 *P(-1.979<~<1.979) = 0.952
               P(hit within A’J = 0.99-0.952 = 0.038
                P’(hit)   = 3~10~~ 120.6/38670.0.038 = 3.6.10-’/lift
                         = 3.6.10-9/lift 20 liftslrig day  500 rig days/20 years/template
                                    +
                         = 3.6.105/20 years/template
                         = 1.8.106/year/template . 17 templates
                         = 3 .O. lO”/year

           Energy absorbed by steel pipe
           The energy required to produce a dent of 3.5% of  OD is found from Equation 7 to be 5.2 M.
           Only items of  approx. 1 tonne will have an impact energy less than 5.2 kJ. It is assumed that
           most  dropped objects will  be  heavier than  this,  and  consequently also assumed that  all
           dropped objects will damage the spool/flowline enough for repair to be required.


           This assumption is conservative because the falling object area (the object will not necessarily
           indent the pipe in a “knife edge” fashion) and the protection offered by the flowline coating is
           neglected.

           16.9.5  Consequence Analysis
           As stated earlier this example analysis pays little attention to  the consequence of  pipeline
           failure. The only consequence which is considered is the environmental damage that could be
           suffered. The damage category which the environment is likely to suffer is ‘minor’.
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334