Page 216 - Plant design and economics for chemical engineers
P. 216

188  PLANT  DESIGN  AND  ECONOMICS  FOR  CHEMICAL  ENGINEERS

       TABLE  20
       Relative labor rate and productivity indexes in the
       chemical and allied products industries for the United States
       (1989Ft
                                 Relative       Relative
                                 labor          productivity
      Geographical area          rate           factor

       New England               1 . 1 4        0 . 9 5
      Middle Atlantic            1.06           0.96
      South Atlantic             0.84           0.91
      Midwest                    1 . 0 3        1.06
      G u l f                    0.95           1.22
      Southwest                  0.88           1.04
      Mountain                   0.88           0.97
      Pacific Coast              1 . 2 2        0.89
      t Adapted from J. M.  Winton,  Plant Sites,  Chem.  Week, 121(24):49  (Dec. 14,  1977),
      and updated with data from M. Kiley, ed., “National  Construction  Estimator,”  37th
      ed., Craftsman Book Company of America, Carlsbad, CA, 1989. Productivity, as
      considered here, is an economic term that gives the value added (products minus
      raw materials) per dollar of total payroll cost. Relative values were determined by
      taking the average of Kiley’s weighted state values in each region divided by the
      weighted average value of all the regions. See also Tables 23 and 24 of this chapter;
      H. Popper and G. E. Weismantel, Costs and Productivity in the Inflationary  197O’s,
      Chem.  Eng.,  77(1):132 (Jan.  12,197O);  and C. H. Edmondson,  Hydrocarbon Process.,
      53(7):167    (1974).

      where  f  is a lumped cost-index factor relative to the original installation cost. ‘D
      is the direct cost and Z is the total indirect cost for the previously installed
      facility of a similar unit on an equivalent site. The value of x  approaches unity
      when the capacity of a process facility is increased by adding identical process
      units instead of increasing the size of the process equipment. The lumped
      cost-index factor  f  is the product of a geographical labor cost index, the
      corresponding area labor productivity index, and a material and equipment cost
      index. Table 20 presents the relative median labor rate and productivity factor
      for various geographical areas in the United States.

           Example  4 Estimating relative costs of construction labor as a function of
           geographical area. If a given chemical process plant is erected near Dallas
           (Southwest area) with a construction labor cost of $100,000 what would be the
           construction labor cost of an identical plant if it were to be erected at the same
           time near Los Angeles (Pacific Coast Area) for the time when the factors given in
          Table 20 apply?


          Solution
           Relative median labor rate-Southwest 0.88 from Table 20
           Relative median labor rate-Pacific Coast 1.22 from Table 20
                                                1.22
                           Relative labor rate ratio =  0  = 1.3864
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221