Page 200 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 200

192                                         A. Branzini and M.S. Zubillaga

            Table 10.1 Comparison between contamination levels in shoot/leaves and roots of Sesbania
            virgata plants, when HM were added individually and in mixture
            ANOVA (p values)                   Cu           Zn          Cr
            Shoots and leaves                   0.0042       0.0006      0.004
            Roots                              <0.001       <0.001      <0.001
            Contrasts
            Shoots and leaves
            Cu and Cu/Zn low vs. Cu and Cu/Zn high  <0.001
            Cu and Cu/Cr low vs. Cu and Cu/Cr high  <0.001
            Cr and Zn/Cr low vs. Cr and Zn/Cr high                       0.0157
            Roots
            Cu and Cu/Zn low vs. Cu and Cu/Zn high  0.0025
            Cu and Cu/Cr low vs. Cu and Cu/Cr high  0.0234
            Zn and Cu/Zn low vs. Zn and Cu/Zn high           0.0002


            Table 10.2 TF and BCF in different tissues of Sesbania virgata under soil HM treatments
                         Cu                Zn                Cr
                             Root   Shoot      Root   Shoot      Root   Shoot
            HM levels    TF  BCF    BCF    TF  BCF    BCF    TF  BCF    BCF
            Control      2.18 1.41  3.07   1.11 0.78  0.87   6.48 0.68  4.40
            Cu      Low 1.11 0.34   0.41
                    High 0.23 0.12  0.03
            Zn      Low                    0.32 2.03  0.64
                    High                   0.42 0.75  0.32
            Cr      Low                                      0.05 1.81  0.09
                    High                                     0.03 1.39  0.05
            Cu/Zn   Low 0.55 0.34   0.19   0.26 2.18  0.56
                    High 0.11 0.80  0.09   0.59 1.40  0.83
            Cu/Cr   Low 0.18 0.29   0.05                     0.11 1.52  0.17
                    High 0.30 0.16  0.05                     0.05 1.08  0.06
            Zn/Cr   Low                    0.30 1.79  0.55   0.28 0.8   0.22
                    High                   0.51 0.72  0.37   0.14 0.53  0.08
            Note: TF Translocation factor, BCF Bioconcentration factor


            the above- and underground part of the plants were <1.0 (Table 10.2). Therefore, all
            heavy metals were accumulated in greater concentrations in plant roots. On the other
            hand, the BCF average in roots was Zn (1.4) > Cr (1.1) > Cu (0.5), the roots being
            more effective than shoots in accumulating heavy metals (Table 10.2). Similarly, to
            that found by other authors, this seems to indicate that S. virgata would have a
            higher bioaccumulation potential of Zn and that it is more effective in removing it
            from soils (Zhang et al. 2010). Absorption and accumulation of heavy metals in
            plant tissues depend upon many factors (Sarma 2011). A significant accumulation of
            Cu, Zn, and Cr in the root system compared with the shoot parts of S. virgata may
            indicate a higher efficiency in restraining the translocation and/or low capacity for
            controlling their absorption, preventing them from reaching metabolically more
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205