Page 102 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 102

2.5 Criteria
        A)  Significant vertical motion amplitude of the echosounder/sonar < 1.0 m for heave compensation
        B)  Allowable roll angle of echosounder/sonar and for launching and retrieving RIB .e 5O
        C)  Criteria for security / operability of the crew
        Significant pitch amplitude <3.5"
        At  the location of the RIB I  sloop, measurement  analysis work spaces, deck  spaces for launch and
        retrieval of buoys and the bridge:
        Significant amplitude vertical accelerations  < 2 m/s2
        Significant amplitude of lateral accelerations 4.5 m/s2 (on the bridge < 2 m/s2)
        D)  General criteria:
        Green water over the bow < 30 timeshour, on the aft deck < 1 timehour
        Slamming < 20 timeshour

        3 DESKSTUDY

        Extensive desk  studies have  been  conducted  in  the early phase  of  the project.  The  first  analysis
        comprised a feasibility study of the application of an existing conventional, single-screw, single-rudder
        ship for the purpcse. Compliance with the staffrequirements was verified for this ship. The desk study
        showed that the existing ship could be adapted in such a way that all requirements were met.
        The second, more elaborate, desk study was conducted to determine the operability of the ship and
        which  propulsion  and  steering arrangements could  be  applied.  Pods  and  thrusters  prove  to  be
        promising for application to various ships and therefore the idea arose that those concepts might be
        advantageous. The propulsion and steering arrangements comprised the following concepts:
          Single-screw single-flap rudder
           Single pod
          Twin screw/twin rudders
           Twinpods
           Single propeller with wing thrusters arrangements.
        3.1 Seakeeping

        The main dimensions of the hull form resulted from operability requirements, the required deck width
        and stability requirements. Operability is defined  here as the proportion of time the ship is able to
        successfully accomplish its missions for given combinations of  sea area,  speeds,  and headings,  see
        Lloyd (1 989) and NATO STANAG 41 54. The complement of operability is referred to as downtime.
        For the above mentioned ship motion criteria and wave statistics the downtime in bow quartering and
        head waves is governed by the vertical motion limits of echosounder and sonar. For beam and stem
        quartering  waves,  the  vertical  motions  continue  to  affect  the  downtime  together  with  lateral
        acceleration limits. The limiting roll angle affects the downtime in stem quartering waves as well.
        In a hull form variation study, length, displacement, C,  and the draught were varied to investigate their
        effects on operability. Also,  a pram  shaped aft hullform  was  evaluated  and  applied because  of  its
        beneficial  effect  on  vertical motions (Blok  and  Beukelman  (1984)  and  Kapsenberg and  Brouwer
        (1998)). Finally, the  study resulted  in the following dimensions and coefficients for further model
        testing.
                                         TABLE 1

        LPP             75 m     A              1850 t    cb              0.47
        B              12.8 m    LCB          36.02 m     C,              0.80
        LT               4m                               CWI             0.80
        The calculations also showed the importance  of effective anti roll tanks  (ART) for beam  and stem
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107