Page 284 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 284

long run. However, the risk measure presented herein does not state anything about the frequency of
       occurrence of cargo shifts. It may be likely that a vessel will experience at least one cargo shift during
       its  lifetime, but  there  is a  difference between  experiencing one or  for example one hundred.  An
       alternate risk measure, e.g. quantifying the most probable number of cargo shifts, may be of interest as
       a complement to the present measure, i.e. the risk of initial cargo shift.
       An implementation of the methodology where consideration is taken to operational factors, such as
       speed reduction in severe weather, will give a more realistic, and probably lower, risk level. This could
       be  done by simply reducing speed in waves with  significant height above a specified limit. A more
       refined method would be to connect the speed reduction or alteration of course to appropriate comfort
       criteria and added resistance in waves. Statistical methods to account more realistically for differences
       in cargo and lashing equipment, as well as improved cargo models would also result in more realistic
       risk  levels. An  improved  cargo  model  could  comprise  e.g.  deformation  of  cargo  and  lashings,
       improved  criteria  for  shifting,  three  dimensional models,  and  accounting for  dynamical  effects.
       Another area of further research is alternative methods for estimating the probability of cargo shift for
       a specific cargo unit  in a specific condition, e.g.  by the use of probability distribution curves. This
       would enable a reduction of the computational time, which is rather large due to extensive simulations.
       Since cargo shifting is most probable in  severe sea conditions improved ship motion  calculations,
       especially roll motion with rather strong non-linearity, is of interest.
       References

       Anderson,  P., Koch, M.  and Sjobris, A.  (1986). Optimum Safety Factors for Securing of Cargo On
       Board Ships. Research Report, MariTenn AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
       Cram&, H. & Leadbetter, M. R.  (1967). Stationary and Related Stochastic Processes. John Wiley &
       Sons, New York, US
       Ericson,  A.  (2000). Ship  and  Cargo Models for  Studying  the  Risk  of  Cargo Shifting  in  Waves.
       Licentiate Thesis, TlUTA-FKT, ISSN 1 103-470X, ISRN KTWFKT/SKP/L.--00/20--SE, Department
       of Naval Architecture, KTH, Sweden
       Ericson, A., Kitllstam, K.,  Rutgersson, O.,  ThedCen, T. (1 999). Probabilistic Models for Ship Safety in
       Rough Seas -Final  report forphase I. KFB-Report 1999:34, Stockholm, Sweden
       Hogben, N.,  Dacha, N.  M. C. & Olliver, G. F.  (1986). Global Wave Statistics. British Maritime
       Technology Limited, FeItham, UK
       McTaggart,  K.  (1998). Ongoing work  examining capsize risk  of intact frigates using time domain
       simulation. 4Ih International Stability Workshop. St. John’s 27-29 September 1998
       Lloyd’s Register. (1999). World Casualty Statistics 1998. Lloyd’s Register, London, UK
       Salvesen, N., Tuck, E.  0. and Faltinsen, 0. (1970). Ship Motions and Sea Loads. Trans. SNAME Vol
       78,250-279.
       St. Denis, M. and Pierson, W.  J. (1953). On the Motions of Ships in Confused Seas; Tram. SNAME
       VOI 61,280-357.
       Swedish Maritime Administration. (1 994). sjiifrtsverkets forfattningssamling 1994:27 9J. Swedish
       Maritime Administration, Sweden (in Swedish)
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289