Page 56 - Practical Ship Design

Introduction, Methods and Data

Table 1.3
c~~nrinuation

A B C J K L M N
Ref Type Name C,(D) V,Total V, Cargo Cap. type y
at D hull Vh
X T Arabiyah 0.872 217552 I50048 L 0.690
9 T Australia Sky 0.838 62999 40386 L 0.641
10 T Columbia 0.872 44 1 762 306300 L 0.693
II T Golar Coleen 0.862 243072 163505 L 0.673
I2 T Golar Cordelia 0.867 475323 350000 L 0.736
13 T Olympic Serenity 0.859 162606 I14580 L 0.705
14 E Achilles 0.850 107716 80428 G 0.747
15 E Amelia 0.857 215740 160699 G 0.745
18 B An Ping 0.844 70102 50082 G 0.7 I4
17 B Angel Feather 0.846 70136 52 125 G 0.743
18 B Clarita 0.861 232 I90 169176 G 0.729
19 B Dahlia 0.873 336553 236359 G 0.702
20 R Arctic Ocean 0.620 25226 13875 R 0.550
21 R Del Monte Cons. 0.688 30465 16424 R 0.539
22 R Del Monte Haw. 0.632 23427 10477 R 0.447
23 R Hokkaido Rex 0.657 24242 13734 R 0.567
24 R African Reefer 0.698 34666 18244 R 0.526
25 R Kowhai 0.687 18398 9432 R 0.513
26 c Cap Polonio 0.691 78965 38923 C 0.493 101 1 TEU
27 C CGM Provence 0.7 16 46990 27258 C 0.580 708 TEU
28 c Hannover Expres 0.758 147370 87857 C 0.596 2282 TEU

T = tanker, B = bulk carrier, L = liquid, G = general, R = refrig., C = container.

Two displacements are usually quoted, one of these being the so-called standard
displacement which has little technical value but the other is the full load displace-
ment. Attempting to correlate the full load displacement with the dimensions
quoted assuming a block coefficient appropriate to the stated speed makes it clear
that quite a few of the figures quoted are not to be trusted. Whether this is due to