Page 57 - Practical Ship Design

28 Chapter 1

Table 1.4 (continued opposite)
Data sheet for destroyers, frigates, and corvettes. Data from Jane’s Fighting Ships . 0 = Ownership; B = build

A B C D E F G H I J
Ref Ship Name Country Year LOA LWL B D Super-
type O/B (LWL) structure
8 F Niteroi Brazil/UK 1976 129.2 122.0 13.5 9.1 68%
9 F Halifax Canada I990 134.1 124.5 16.4 11.1 0%
IO c Niels Juel Denmark 1980 84.0 80.5 10.3 6.3 59%

11 F Lafayette France 1994 1 19.0 1 10.0 13.8 7.3 69%
12 D Geo. Leygoues France 1979 139.0 132.8 14.0 9.5 0%
13 F Bremen Germany I979 130.0 121.8 14.5 9.2 0%
14 D Animoso Italy 1992 147.7 137.0 15.0 9.8 0%
15 F Maestrale Italy 1982 122.7 115.0 12.9 8.9 22%
16 F Lupo Italy 1977 113.2 107.0 11.3 8.0 20%
17 F Dat Assawari LibyaKJK 1973 101.5 95.4 11.7 7.3 50%
18 F Abukama Japan 1989 109.0 102.0 13.4 7.7 0%
19 F Karel Dorman Netherlands 1990 122.3 115.5 14.4 9.0 0%
20 F Kortenauer Netherlands I978 130.5 122.0 14.6 9.0 0%
21 D Sovremenny USSR 1980 156.0 144.4 17.3 10.1 42%
22 F Krivak I USSR 1981 123.5 I 14.9 14.0 9.5 86%
23 F Type 22 batch 1 UK 1979 131.2 125.0 14.8 9.8 68%
24 F Type 22 batch 2 UK 1984 146.5 136.5 14.8 9.8 79%
25 F Type 23 # UK 1989 133.0 123.0 15.3# 8.9 0%
26 D S p r u a n c e USA 1975 171.7 161.6 16.8 12.8 0%
27 F Oliver H Perry USA 1977 138.1 135.6 13.7 9.7 0%

Where Cb figures calculatedfrom displacements appear incorrect by up to IO% these are marked *; incorrect by
more than 10% these are marked **.
# Max. beam = 16. I m.

deliberate misinformation in the interests of security or coyness about weight
overruns it is impossible to say. It is also impossible to be sure precisely which
figures are wrong, but it seems likely that the displacements are in most cases fairly
correct and it is the drafts which are incorrect - in some cases by up to a metre.