Page 53 - Practical Ship Design
P. 53
24 Chapter I
Table 1.2 (continued opposite)
Deadweight/displacement ratio, based on data from Signifcanr Ships 1990/199 I
A B C D E F G H I J
Ref Type Name L B D Td TS Dwt (d) Dwt (s)
(tonnes) (tonnes)
8 T Argo Electra 315.00 57.20 30.40 20.80 285000
9 T B .P.Admiral 169.00 30.80 17.00 10.00 1 1.52 33000 41100
10 c Cap Polonio 188.20 32.30 18.80 10.00 12.00 22263 33205
I1 c CGM Provence 166.96 27.50 14.30 10.52 26288
12 B China Pride 215.00 32.20 18.00 12.50 13.11 61687 65655
13 R Del Monte Pride 147.50 23.50 12.75 6.70 9.10 6300 12700
14 M Hornbay 141.50 23.00 13.90 7.30 8.70 5900 9429
15 R Ice Star 84.27 15.10 7.75 5.30 3187
16 T Jahre Traveller 260.00 44.50 24.20 15.60 16.60 131000 142000
17 C Katherine Sif 120.70 22.70 11.30 7.60 8.60 9766 12112
18 C Nordlight 145.20 22.86 11.20 7.65 8.62 11420 14190
19 M Serenity 146.85 23.05 13.40 10.09 17175
20 T Zafra * 218.70 32.24 21.60 11.58 16.00 54000 84000
21 T Bunga Siantan 133.00 22.40 1 1.80 9.10 16294
22 T Fandango 173.00 32.20 17.80 12.25 46087
23 B Front Driver * 275.00 45.00 25.90 18.50 169178
24 C Hanover Express 281.60 32.25 2 I .40 12.50 13.52 55590 67780
25 B Solidarnosc * 224.60 32.24 19.00 12.50 14.10 63000 74000
26 C Vladivostok 225.25 32.20 18.80 1 1.00 12.00 40250 47120
27 B Western Bridge 239.00 38.00 21.50 15.02 96275
*Indicates double hull construction. Suffix d = design draft, s = summer draft.
1.3.3.3 Warship dimensions and data from Jane’s Fighting Ships
As a source of warship data, Jane’s Fighting Ships must take pride of place. Like
Lloyds Register, this volume is published every year and therefore provides up-to-
date information. It is well illustrated with line drawings of ship profiles together
with photographs of almost every ship in the world’s navies and sometimes several
different views in the case of the more important ships. It gives fairly extensive