Page 324 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 324

,i.l.


           MEMBRANE PROCESSES                                          301
 PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
 300
                 _  BOr-----------------=--c,-7
                 "
 where a'(x)  s given by  Eq. 8.10. For any soecified feed comoositi~n (xr) and   ,_,
 1
 pressure  ratm (.9')  the  mtegration  yields  directly  the  relat1onsh1p  between
 the fractional  recovery and punty of the raffinate product.   0
                 ~ 60
 8.3.3  Counter Current Flow   I   "'  w
                 6
                 u
 For  the countercurrent  flow  case ·the  integration  is slightly  !es~ _straightfor•   1   w   /
 4
                 er
 ward, smcc  it  ,s  necessary to  allow for  the variation  m  compos1t1on  on  both   I   oi.   /  Mixed  Flow
 sides of the membrane. A differential balance for each comoonent across the   §   /   o( =10
  I
 membrane [Figure 8.6(a)] yields:   I   ~          I
 (8.18)          )t                               I
 -dLA = d( Lx) = "TTA  dA ( P11  - PLy)   "-  ,   I
 -dL = -d[L(l-x)]  =1T dA[PH(l-xJ-Pc{l-y)]   (8.19)   ,
 8  8                                           I
 (8.20)             0 '---'--L--L-..L_.L.__,_,c_,_-1._-L_..L~
 d(Lx)=d(I.:y);   dL=dI.:
                     0       2       4       6       B       10
 Dividing Eas. 8.18 and 8.19:    •1.  01   1n  RAFFINATE
 -Ldx - xdL   L  + xdL/dx   (8.21)   Figure 8.8  Rccovcry--puritv profile for production of nitrogen from air hy membrane
 Ldx-(1-x)dL   ( 1 - x) dL/dx - L   and PSA processes. :i
 a(PHx - PLY)
 PH(l -x) -PL(J -y)   With,  a,  P,  and  x  2   specified,  the  recovery  may  now  be  calcuiated  by
                                                                       2
 1  dL   1   (8.22)   integration  starting  from  the  raffinate  product  end  at  which  ! = i .0,  x  is
 - L  d.x  =   fixed,  and  y ,s known  from  Eq. 8.27.
                     2
 Jn order to integrate this ex;oression, we must express  y  in ter~s of x. This 1s
             8.3.4  Comparison of Recovery - Punty Profiles
 accomolished by a  mass balance over the dotted section in  Figure 8.?a.
           The  results  of such  caJcuJat1om,  for  a  pressure  ratio  5.0  and  permeability
 (8.23)    rat10s  of 5 and  10  are shown  m  Figure  8.8.  These values  are  typical  of the
           current  membrane  processes  for  recovery  of nitrogen  from  a1r  m  which  the
 To  avoid  the  need  for  a  trial  and  error solution,  1t  is  easier  to change  the   nitrogen is  the  less  permeable species. The strong effects of both permeabil-
 variable and integrate from the raffinate end:   1ty  ratio  and flow  pattern  on  performance  are 1mmediately apparent. These
           effects become most pronounced in  the high-ounty region, which  1s  generally
 .   L   Lx-x 2   (8.24)
 !=-,-,   y=  l-1'   ! =  1.0, l  -  X  =  X2   the reg10n of oract1cal  interest.
 L2
 p   I  dL  _   1   (8.25)
 - ,   di  - x+«/[(1-«) + (1-P)/(xP-y)]   8.4  Cascades for  Membrane Processes

 At the raffinate end  y  2   1s  given  by:   Where a  pure product is  required  1t  1s  often advantageous to  use ITiore  than
           one  membrane  element  connected  m  senes  as  a  "cascade."  The  best  ar-
 NA   Y,   l.   Px, - Y,   \   (8.26)   rangement depends on several factors, .the most impOrtant being whether the
 Nn  =  l  -y, =a  P(l -x )  - (1-y,))   primary requirement 1s  for  a  pure  raffinate (rctentate) product or for  a  pure
 2
           permeate. If the requirement 1s  for a  pure raffinate product a countercurrent
 which  is  a  s1mpie quadratic equatwn:
           flow  system  is  the  hest  arrangement.  If  idcai  countercurrcnt  flow  could  be
 Yi(l - i/a) - y [(1  - 1/a)(l + Px,) +IV/a]+ Px 2 = 0   (8.27)   achieved  within  a  membrane  eiement,  there  would  be  no  advantage  to  be
 2
   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329