Page 326 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 326

Chapter 9

                              ELECTROKINETIC FLOW


                         W. B. J. ZIMMERMAN and J. M. MACINNES
               Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield,
                       Newcastle Street, Sheffield S1 3JD United Kingdom

                              E-mail:  j. m. macinnes @ she$ ac. uk

             This chapter explores  the multiphysics  modeling  appropriate for electrokinetic  flow  in
             microchannel  networks.  In setting up our case study, we learned how FEMLAB’s weak
             boundary  constraints are needed for coupled boundary  conditions that  incorporate  non-
             tangential  boundary conditions.  To illustrate the utility of weak boundary conditions in
             accurate flux  computations, we  revisit  the  electrical  capacitance tomography  forward
             problem  defined in  17.3.2.  After  this  simple example, we  move  on  to  implementing
             more complicated weak boundary constraints in the electrokinetic flow model.  The latter
             explores FEMLAB’s  guidelines for when to use  a weak boundary  constraint and when
             they fail.


          9.1  Introduction

          The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the facility of setting up a model
          for  electrokinetic  flow  in  FEMLAB.   A  cutting  edge  application  for
          electrokinetic  flow  is  microfluidics,  wherein  small  quantities  of  chemicals
          (nanoliters)  are  transported  “just-in-time’’  for  complicated  switching  and
          sequencing  in  a  network  of  microchannels  to  achieve  high  reproducibility  of
          chemical reactions and compositional changes by tight control.  Moving fluids
         by  physicochemical  phenomena  is  especially  important  since  it  involves  fast
         response  times  and  no  moving  mechanical  parts  that  can  become  damaged.
         There is a strong overlap between microfluidics  and micromechanical machines
          (MEMs).  For  instance,  moving  macromolecules  adjacent  to  walls  and  side
          channels  as  soft  actuators  is  considered  microfluidics,  but  these  are  also
          molecular  machines,  but  at  a  scale  too  small  to  be  considered  conventional
         moving parts.
             In  order  to  set  up  even  our  simplest  electrokinetic  model,  however,
         multiphysics  is  essential - coupling  electric  potential,  chemical  transport,  and
          momentum transport (Navier-Stokes).  Furthermore,  a first approach introduces
          some coupling through boundary conditions to approximate the electrochemical
          boundary layer motion.  Although this coupling is linear, we found that to get an
          acceptable model  in FEMLAB, the  set up requires weak boundary  constraints.




                                         313
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331