Page 217 - Psychological Management of Individual Performance
P. 217

Chapter 10

                                             The High Performance Cycle:

                                                  Standing the Test of Time



                                                                              Gary P. Latham,
                                                               University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                                                                              Edwin A. Locke
                                                         University of Maryland, College Park, USA, and
                                                                               Neil E. Fassina
                                                               University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada



                        INTRODUCTION 202                    MODERATORS 216
                          HISTORICAL CONTEXT 202              ABILITY AND TASK COMPLEXITY  217
                        THE HIGH PERFORMANCE CYCLE 203        SITUATIONAL CONSTRAINTS AND UNCERTAINTY 218
                        DEMANDS INFLUENCE PERFORMANCE 204     FEEDBACK 219
                          GOALS 204                           GOAL COMMITMENT 219
                          SELF-EFFICACY 213                 PERFORMANCE LEADS TO ORGANIZATION
                          GROWTH-FACILITATING TASKS 214     COMMITMENT 221
                          INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 214        SATISFACTION LEADS TO ORGANIZATION
                        MEDIATORS 215                       COMMITMENT 221
                          DIRECTION 215                     DISCUSSION 222
                          EFFORT AND PERSISTENCE  215       ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 223
                          TASK-SPECIFIC STRATEGIES 216      REFERENCES 223


                        SUMMARY
                            Locke and Latham’s (1990a, b) high performance cycle (HPC) states that specific dif-
                            ficult goals lead to high performance. High performance on enriched tasks is usually
                            rewarding for the individual. Rewards generate satisfaction that subsequently encour-
                            ages commitment to the organization. The literature from 1990 through the spring
                            of 2000 was reviewed to determine whether the HPC has withstood the test of time.
                            Significant advancements were made in understanding the physiology of goal setting.
                            Moreover, research has identified the benefit of setting learning goals for complex
                            tasks as well as the benefit of setting proximal goals in environments marked by
                            uncertainty. An understanding of how the consequences of high performance affect
                            satisfaction and subsequent organizational commitment requires additional research.
                            Research conducted over the past decade generated unanswered questions regarding
                            potential moderator variables influencing the effects of proximal and learning goals,
                            as well as moderators influencing the effect of enriched tasks on the setting of and
                            commitment to high goals.




                        Psychological Management of Individual Performance. Edited by Sabine Sonnentag.
                         C   2002 John Wiley& Sons, Ltd.  ISBN: 0-471-87726-3
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222