Page 279 - Radar Technology Encyclopedia
P. 279

269   mixer, transistor                                                           modulation, amplitude



           field-effect tetrodes are frequently  used.  The  noise  perfor-  (1) Modeling the target and interference environment, the
           mance of field-effect transistor mixers is slightly worse than  propagation medium, and the major  radar subsystems
           for diode mixers, but they perform the conversion with some  (antenna, transmitter, receiver, and signal processor), and then
           gain  (3 to 10  dB) reducing the IF amplifier noise figure  simulating radar operation  with this model.  Typically this
           requirements. The output power for transistor mixers is about  approach is  more flexible with respect to variation in the
           an order more than for diode mixers, so the dynamic range is  radar and environmental parameters, and it offers estimates of
           about 10 to 20 dB larger. IAM                        the entire set of radar characteristics in detection, tracking,
           Ref.: Fink (1982), p. 14.64; Gassanov (1988), p. 133.  and as applicable in the target discrimination mode. However,
                                                                it requires the development of complicated and costly models,
           The tunnel diode mixer is based on the tunnel diode as an
                                                                and is often  based  on  Monte-Carlo simulation (statistical
           active component, and has signal gain because of the negative
                                                                modeling) because analytical models (based on closed-form
           resistance of the  diode. Tunnel  diode  mixers are unstable
                                                                equations) cannot be applied. Algorithms for this approach
           while  operating. Power handling capability and  dynamic
                                                                are described in Leonov (1979).
           range are lower than for diode mixers, and noise performance
                                                                    (2) Development of a model for the particular radar char-
           is only slightly better. Consequently, they have no wide range
                                                                acteristic of interest (e.g., probability of detection, measure-
           of practical application. IAM
                                                                ment  error,  subclutter visibility,  etc.)  as a function of the
           Ref.: Gassanov (1988), p. 112.
                                                                factors  affecting this characteristic  (transmitter power,
           An  unbalanced mixer incorporates a  directional coupler,  antenna gain, number of received pulses, type of signal pro-
           summing microwave signals and a single-band rectifier (mul-  cessor, etc.). In this case the models can be less complicated,
           tiplier) based on the mixing diode. The working point is  or combined (analytical-statistical) models can be developed
           located on the straight part of the volt-ampere curve, corre-  (see ERROR model). This approach requires less develop-
           sponding to the current of 0.5 to 1.0 mA produced by the rec-  ment time, but is applicable only to estimation of the charac-
           tified voltage of local oscillators. When the signal voltage is  teristic for which the  model was developed, and the
           considerably less than the LO voltage, the mixer performs a  applicability of  results  is  limited by the assumptions of the
           linear transformation of the signal spectrum. Typically, unbal-  analytical model (e.g., operation in white, Gaussian  noise,
           anced mixers with high sideband and those with low sideband  with a Rayleigh target, in Rayleigh clutter, etc.). SAL
           are  distinguished, depending on the  location of the signal  Ref.: Leonov (1979).
           band relative to the LO frequency. Significant levels of sum
           (w  + w LO ) and image (2w LO  - w LO ) frequencies are present  (RCS) fluctuation model (see RCS fluctuation).
             s
           at the mixer output besides the difference (intermediate) fre-
                                                                Swerling model (see RCS fluctuation).
           quency. These  oscillations are reflected from the diode and
           can be either absorbed by the matched load at mixer input, or  MODULATION. Modulation is “the process by which some
           reflected from the input by means of filters circuits. A mixer  characteristic of  the carrier is  varied in accordance with  a
           matched at the input has conversion losses of 8 to 10 dB and  modulating  wave” and  the result of that process. In radar
           is  broadband with  linear frequency-phase response.  Mixers  applications three basic types of modulation are used: (ampli-
           with reflections have losses which are 1 to 2 dB less, but their  tude)-pulse modulation,  frequency modulation, and  phase
           bandwidth is lower.                                  modulation. SAL
               Unbalanced mixers typically have waveguide, coaxial, or  Ref.: IEEE (1993), p. 816.
           microstrip structure. The main disadvantages are the higher
                                                                Amplitude modulation is “the process by which a continu-
           LO power compared to signal power and the conversion of
                                                                ous high-frequency wave (carrier) is caused to vary in ampli-
           LO noise to intermediate frequency. Consequently, they have
                                                                tude by the action of another wave containing information.”
           a relatively high noise factor, 10 to  15 dB, (which can be
                                                                The analytical formula for amplitude-modulated signal is
           reduced by cooling). IAM
           Ref.: Gassanov (1988), p. 113.                                ut () A sin ( w t +  f )
                                                                             =
                                                                                0    0   0
           MODEL                                                                M A
                                                                                  0 0
                                                                               –  --------------cos [ ( w +  W ) t +  f +  y ]
                                                                                  2       0       0
           atmospheric model (see ATMOSPHERE).                                  M A
                                                                                  0 0
                                                                               +  -------------- cos [ ( w –  W ) t +  f –  y ]
                                                                                                  0
                                                                                          0
           clutter model (see CLUTTER).                                           2
                                                                where  A  is the amplitude of carrier  oscillation,  M  is the
                                                                                                           0
                                                                       0
           detector model (see DETECTOR).                       modulation coefficient, w and f  are the frequency and ini-
                                                                                           0
                                                                                     0
                                                                                                ar
                                                                tial phase of the carrier, and W and y e the frequency and
           error model (see ERROR model).
                                                                the initial phase of the modulating signal.
           The radar model describes a radar system operating against  The first term is the underlying unmodulated oscillation
           a specified class of targets in a specified environment. There  with carrier frequency w ; the second and third terms are the
                                                                                    0
           are two basic approaches to modeling of radar operation:  description of oscillations due to amplitude modulation pro-
                                                                cess. The frequencies of these oscillations w  + W and w  + W
                                                                                                             0
                                                                                                   0
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284