Page 195 - Reservoir Formation Damage
P. 195

Crystal Growth and Scale Formation in Porous Media  177


                   > 1 scale  formation
                   = 1 equilibrium
                                                                        (9-37)
                   < 1 scale dissolution

             and  k' c  is  a  scale  formation rate  constant  incorporating  the  above  mentioned
             shape  factors  and  some  constants.  The  minus  sign  in  Eq.  9-35  is  for  the
             reduction  of  porosity  by  scale  formation  at  the  pore  surface.  Thus,
             assuming  the  rock  porosity,  (|) r,  remains  constant  and  substituting  Eq.
             9-33  into  9-35  leads  to  an  equation  similar  to  Ortoleva  et  al.  (1987):



                 rs                                                     (9-38)
                    dt
             subject  to


                                                                        (9-39)

               Assume  that  the  surface  area  of  crystal  available  for  growth  can  be
             expressed  empirically  by:


                                                                        (9-40)

             in  which  /(({>)  is  the  specific  surface  of  the  mineral-fluid  contact  area
             (surface  area  per  unit  mineral  mass)  expressed  as  a  function  of  porosity.
             Civan  (1996)  approximated  this  function  according  to  Eq.  9-32.  Thus,
             substituting  Eq.  9-40  into  Eq.  9-23  leads  to  Holstad's  (1995)  equation:


                                                                        (9-41)


             Holstad  (1995)  expressed  the  temperature  dependency  of  the  crystal-
             lization  rate  constant  by  the Arrhenius  equation:



                                                                        (9-42)
                               RT
             where  F M,  A M,  and  E M  denote  an  empirical  mineral  property  factor,  an
             Arrhenius  pre-factor,  and  the  activation  energy.  Liu  et  al.  (1997)  used  a
             similar  equation
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200