Page 409 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 409

THE ELLIOT LAKE ROOM-AND-PILLAR MINES

                                          Equation 13.22 describes the bearing capacity developed under a long rib pillar.
                                        For pillars of length l p , the expression for bearing capacity is modified to reflect the
                                        changed pillar plan shape; i.e.

                                                             1
                                                        q b =   w p N   S   + c cot  N q S q − c cot    (13.23)
                                                             2
                                        where S   and S q are shape factors defined by

                                                               S   = 1.0 − 0.4(w p /l p )
                                                                S q = 1.0 + sin   (w p /l p )

                                        The factor of safety against bearing capacity failure is given by

                                                                   FofS = q b /  p

                                        i.e. it is assumed that the average axial pillar stress is equivalently applied as a uni-
                                        formly distributed normal load to the adjacent country rock. The coarseness of this
                                        assumption justifies the practical choice of a factor of safety greater than 2.0.


                                        13.6 The Elliot Lake room-and-pillar mines

                                        The history of mining the uranium-bearing orebodies of the Elliot Lake district of
                                        western Ontario, Canada, is interesting because of the evolution of the mining layout
                                        and rock response as mining progressed down dip. Rock mechanics aspects of mine
                                        performance have been described by Hedley and Grant (1972) and Hedley et al.
                                        (1984). More than 30 years’ observations of roof and pillar performance are recorded
                                        for the orebodies.
                                          As described by Hedley et al. (1984), the conglomerate stratiform orebodies at
                                        Elliot Lake are set on the north and south limbs of a broad syncline. Figure 13.20 is a
                                        north–south cross section, looking east, showing the Quirke and Denison mines on the
                                        north limb. The orebodies are from3mto8m thick and dip south at about 15 –20 ,
                                                                                                          ◦
                                                                                                      ◦
                                        persisting to a depth of 1050 m. They are separated from the basement rock by a
                                        quartzite bed, and overlain successively by beds of quartzite, argillite, a massive 250
                                        m bed of quartzite, and conglomerate and limestone formations. Although the orebody
                                        rock is unbedded, the hangingwall contact is commonly a prominent bedding plane
                                        with an argillaceous parting. Diabase dykes and numerous normal faults transgress
                                        the orebodies, and several thrust faults are prominent features. The rock material
                                        strengths of the orebody, footwall and hangingwall rocks are generally greater than
                                        200 MPa. The pre-mining state of stress is defined by a vertical principal stress,   v ,
                                        equal to the depth stress, an east–west horizontal stress about 1.5   v , and a north–south
                                        component about equal to   v .
                                          At the Quirke Mine, the mining method resembled that shown in Figure 12.2, with
                                        transport drifts developed along strike, at 47 m vertical intervals. This resulted in
                                        stopes with a down-dip dimension of about 76 m. Crown and sill pillars protected
                                        the rail haulages. Rib pillars, instead of the scattered, irregularly shaped panel pillars
                                        shown in Figure 12.2, separated the stopes which were mined up dip from the haulage
                                        level.
                                        391
   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414