Page 579 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 579

EXAMPLES OF MONITORING ROCK MASS PERFORMANCE

                                        (b) a recognition of the low frictional resistance likely to be generated on smooth,
                                            continuous, graphite-coated and slickensided bedding planes; and
                                        (c) an understanding of the rˆole played by rock mass stiffness in governing induced
                                            stress magnitudes.

                                        18.3.2  Convergence monitoring, production level, PT Freeport Indonesia’s
                                        Deep Ore Zone Mine, Ertsberg, Indonesia
                                        Undercutting at Freeport Indonesia’s Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) block caving mine com-
                                        menced in 2000. The production or extraction level at a depth of about 1200 m below
                                        surface uses an offset herringbone layout as discussed in section 15.5.4. The produc-
                                        tion level will be eventually 900 m long and, on average, 200 m wide with widths of
                                        up to 350 m. Production drifts are on 30 m centres with drawpoints at 18 m centers
                                        along the drifts. A transition has been made from a post-undercutting to an advanced
                                        undercutting strategy. The undercut level is 30 m above the production level. These
                                        and other details of the layout and operation are given by Barber et al. (2000).
                                          The performance of the production level excavations is monitored using conver-
                                        gence stations, multiple point borehole extensometers, stressmeters and concrete
                                        crack observations (Rachmad and Widijanto, 2002). Cave propagation is monitored
                                        using time domain reflectometry (TDR) and surface subsidence in the mountainous
                                        terrain is monitored using aerial photography and TDR methods. The areas near crit-
                                        ical surface installations are monitored in more detail using surveying techniques
                                        and extensometers (Rachmad and Sulaeman, 2002). The present account will con-
                                        centrate on the use of convergence monitoring on the production level. Rachmad and
                                        Widijanto (2002) found that the results of the convergence measurements were con-
                                        sistent with results obtained from the other types of measurement and so they became
                                        the main form of monitoring used. Subsequently, stress cells and MPBX installations
                                        were used only for special purposes.
                                          The convergence stations installed on the DOZ mine production level are as il-
                                        lustrated in Figure 18.1b. Convergence measurements are made manually, usually at
                                        weekly intervals, using a tape extensometer of the type shown in Figure 18.2. The
                                        convergence data are converted to vertical and horizontal components and, for pur-
                                        poses of analysis and visualisation, are plotted as displacement rates (mm/day) on
                                        production level plans using mine planning software as shown in Figure 18.13. As
                                        the examples to be given below illustrate, the convergence and convergence rate data
                                        are used to ensure safety during development and production, and to verify the design
                                        assumptions made about the response of the rock mass to caving, including the nature
                                        of the stress abutment associated with undercutting.


                                        High stresses associated with undercutting. Points 1 and 2 in Figure 18.13a are
                                        peaks of high vertical convergence rate located close to the undercut boundary. Such
                                        observations provide confirmation of the assumption that a concentration of vertical
                                        stress and an abutment stress zone will develop at the undercut boundary. More
                                        importantly, convergence rate data and observations of damage led to the conclusion
                                        that a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/day is a trigger value for action to limit further
                                        convergence. In the case of points 1 and 2 in Figure 18.13a, the peak convergence
                                        rates are greater that 0.5 mm/day and steps were taken to move the undercut front
                                        immediately (Rachmad and Widijanto, 2002).
                                        561
   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584