Page 167 - Separation process engineering
P. 167

distillation column.


                      Example 4-4. McCabe-Thiele analysis of open steam heating

                      The feed is 60 mol% methanol and 40 mol% water and is input as a two-phase mixture that flashes so
                      that V /F = 0.3. Feed flow rate is 350 kmol/h. The column is well insulated and has a total condenser.
                             F
                      The reflux is returned to the column as a saturated liquid. An external reflux ratio of L /D = 3.0 is
                                                                                                                        0
                      used. We desire a distillate concentration of 95 mol% methanol and a bottoms concentration of 8
                      mol% methanol. Instead of using a reboiler, saturated steam at 1 atm is sparged directly into the
                      bottom of the column to provide boilup. (This is called direct or open steam.) Column pressure is 1
                      atm. Calculate the number of equilibrium stages and the optimum feed plate location.

                      Solution

                      A. Define. It helps to draw a schematic diagram of the apparatus, particularly since a new type of
                         distillation is involved. This is shown in Figure 4-15. We wish to find the optimum feed plate
                         location, N , and the total number of equilibrium stages, N, required for this separation. We could
                                      F
                         also calculate Q , D, B, and the steam rate S, but these were not asked for. We assume that the
                                            c
                         column is adiabatic since it is well insulated.

                                          Figure 4-15. Distillation with direct steam heating, Example 4-4








































                      B. Explore. The first thing we need is equilibrium data. Fortunately, these are readily available (see

                         Table 2-7 in Problem 2.D1).
                      Second, we would like to assume CMO so that we can use the McCabe-Thiele analysis procedure.
                      An easy way to check this assumption is to compare the latent heats of vaporization per mole
                      (Himmelblau, 1974).

                                                          ΔH  vap  methanol (at bp) = 8.43 kcal/mol

                                                            ΔH vap  water (at bp) = 9.72 kcal/mol
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172