Page 131 - Serious Incident Prevention How to Achieve and Sustain Accident-Free Operations in Your Plant or Company
P. 131

CH10pp103-110  4/10/02  12:50 PM  Page 109






                                                    Establishing Performance Standards    109


                            dency toward deafness and blindness to early warning signals of potential
                            problems may develop.
                               The World War II attack on Pearl Harbor would likely have resulted in
                            less tragic consequences for the United States if radar operators had
                            promptly issued an alert after observing an unusually large blip on the radar
                            screen. Operators apparently did not have the competence and confidence
                            needed to properly interpret and report this “red-flag” condition. Rather
                            than risking the possibility of sounding a false alarm on a Sunday morning,
                            operators looked for alternate explanations and ultimately rationalized the
                            activity as a squadron of U.S. bombers. The first wave of Japanese aircraft
                            arrived without warning at Pearl Harbor 38 minutes later. Following the at-
                            tack, deficiencies in battle readiness standards were addressed by relieving
                            top military commanders from their assignments, but the damage at Pearl
                            Harbor had been done. 3
                               Employees need more than a road map for performing critical work; a
                            compass is needed to provide direction in uncharted territory. Employees on
                            night shift, for example, need to understand they have authority and are ex-
                            pected to shut down equipment as needed to maintain safe conditions.
                            Employees are continually recalibrating their compasses based upon how
                            they perceive management reactions to events. When employees are faced
                            with difficult decisions regarding actions to take, factors—such as how the
                            boss reacted the last time equipment was shut down, and the level of mutual
                            confidence between the boss and employee—become critical. North on the
                            compass is continually being redirected by management’s actions—includ-
                            ing some actions subject to misinterpretation. It has been observed, for ex-
                            ample, that if equipment is down for repairs, managers often ask their
                            subordinates when startup will be, but the message typically heard by sub-
                            ordinates is, “Hurry, we’re losing money!” In these situations, employees
                            may rationalize the taking of shortcuts, including the violation of safe work
                            practices, in order to achieve the results they perceive to be the most im-
                            portant to the boss. Managers need to remember that their communications
                            and personal reactions continually shape and reshape employee perceptions
                            of expected performance.


                            Standards—A Prerequisite for
                            Measurement, Feedback, and

                            Accountability

                               Standards provide benchmarks for measurement and a basis for per-
                            formance feedback.
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136