Page 356 - Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design
P. 356

bud29281_ch06_265-357.qxd  12/03/2009  9:47 am  Page 331 pinnacle 203:MHDQ196:bud29281:0073529281:bud29281_pagefiles:







                                                                               Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading  331
                       Figure 6–36                                             Class        No.
                                                                             1 All metals   380
                       The lognormal probability                             2  Nonferrous  152
                       density PDF of the fatigue ratio              3       3  Iron and carbon steels 111
                                                                        4    4  Low-alloy steels  78
                       φ b of Gough.
                                                                             5 Special alloy steels  39
                                                Probability density  1         5
                                                       2
                                                 5




                                                 0
                                                         0.3    0.4    0.5   0.6    0.7
                                                            Rotary bending fatigue ratio   b




                                               Also, 25 plain carbon and low-alloy steels with S ut > 212 kpsi are described by

                                                                       S = 107LN(1, 0.139) kpsi
                                                                        e
                                               In summary, for the rotating-beam specimen,

                                                         ⎧
                                                         ⎪ 0.506S ut LN(1, 0.138) kpsi or MPa  S ut ≤ 212 kpsi (1460 MPa)
                                                               ¯
                                                                                         ¯
                                                         ⎨
                                                                                         ¯                     (6–70)
                                                    S =   107LN(1, 0.139) kpsi           S ut > 212 kpsi
                                                     e
                                                         ⎪
                                                          740LN(1, 0.139) MPa            S ut > 1460 MPa
                                                         ⎩                               ¯
                                               where S ut is the mean ultimate tensile strength.
                                                     ¯
                                                  Equations (6–70) represent the state of information before an engineer has chosen
                                               a material. In choosing, the designer has made a random choice from the ensemble of
                                               possibilities, and the statistics can give the odds of disappointment. If the testing is lim-
                                               ited to finding an estimate of the ultimate tensile strength mean  S ut with the chosen
                                                                                                     ¯
                                               material, Eqs. (6–70) are directly helpful. If there is to be rotary-beam fatigue testing,
                                               then statistical information on the endurance limit is gathered and there is no need for
                                               the correlation above.
                                                                                                        ¯
                                                  Table 6–9 compares approximate mean values of the fatigue ratio φ 0.30 for several
                                               classes of ferrous materials.
                                               Endurance Limit Modifying Factors
                                               A Marin equation can be written as

                                                                          S e = k a k b k c k d k f S          (6–71)
                                                                                        e
                                               where the size factor  k b is deterministic and remains unchanged from that given in
                                               Sec. 6–9. Also, since we are performing a stochastic analysis, the “reliability factor” k e
                                               is unnecessary here.
                                                  The surface factor k a cited earlier in deterministic form as Eq. (6–20), p. 288, is
                                               now given in stochastic form by
                                                                      b
                                                                                    ¯
                                                               k a = aS LN(1, C)   (S ut in kpsi or MPa)       (6–72)
                                                                      ¯
                                                                      ut
                                               where Table 6–10 gives values of a, b, and C for various surface conditions.
   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361