Page 417 - Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design
P. 417

bud29281_ch07_358-408.qxd  12/9/09  4:35PM  Page 392 ntt 203:MHDQ196:bud29281:0073529281:bud29281_pagefiles:







                 392    Mechanical Engineering Design
                  Figure 7–17

                  (a) Gib-head key;
                  (b) Woodruff key.

                                                                                            1
                                                                                        Taper    in over 12 in
                                                                                            8
                                                                               w              w

                                                                                    h
                                                                     (a)






                                                                                    D

                                                                                           w


                                                                     (b)



                                              The gib-head key, in Fig. 7–17a, is tapered so that, when firmly driven, it acts to
                                          prevent relative axial motion. This also gives the advantage that the hub position can be
                                          adjusted for the best axial location. The head makes removal possible without access to
                                          the other end, but the projection may be hazardous.
                                              The Woodruff key, shown in Fig. 7–17b, is of general usefulness, especially when a
                                          wheel is to be positioned against a shaft shoulder, since the keyslot need not be machined
                                          into the shoulder stress concentration region. The use of the Woodruff key also yields bet-
                                          ter concentricity after assembly of the wheel and shaft. This is especially important at high
                                          speeds, as, for example, with a turbine wheel and shaft. Woodruff keys are particularly use-
                                          ful in smaller shafts where their deeper penetration helps prevent key rolling. Dimensions
                                          for some standard Woodruff key sizes can be found in Table 7–7, and Table 7–8 gives the
                                          shaft diameters for which the different keyseat widths are suitable.
                                                   8
                                              Pilkey gives values for stress concentrations in an end-milled keyseat, as a func-
                                          tion of the ratio of the radius r at the bottom of the groove and the shaft diameter d.
                                          For fillets cut by standard milling-machine cutters, with a ratio of  r/d = 0.02,
                                          Peterson’s charts give K t = 2.14 for bending and K ts = 2.62 for torsion without the
                                          key in place, or K ts = 3.0 for torsion with the key in place. The stress concentration
                                          at the end of the keyseat can be reduced somewhat by using a sled-runner keyseat,
                                          eliminating the abrupt end to the keyseat, as shown in Fig. 7–17. It does, however, still
                                          have the sharp radius in the bottom of the groove on the sides. The sled-runner key-
                                          seat can only be used when definite longitudinal key positioning is not necessary. It is
                                          also not as suitable near a shoulder. Keeping the end of a keyseat at least a distance




                                          8 W. D. Pilkey, Peterson’s Stress-Concentration Factors, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997,
                                          pp. 408–409.
   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422