Page 252 -

250 R. Seri and D. Secchi

Herath, D., Costello, J., & Homberg, F. (2017). Team problem solving and motivation under
disorganization – an agent-based modeling approach. Team Performance Management, 23(1/2),
46–65.
Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power. The American Statistician, 55(1),
19–24.
Kollman, K., Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (1992). Adaptive parties in spatial elections. The American
Political Science Review, 86(4), 929–937.
Korn, E. L. (1990). Projecting power from a previous study: Maximum likelihood estimation. The
American Statistician, 44(4), 290–292.
Lakatos, E. (2005). Sample size determination for clinical trials. In Encyclopedia of biostatistics.
Hoboken: Wiley.
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. Euro-
pean Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710.
Lakens, D. & Evers, E. R. K. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability
practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 9(3), 278–292.
Lamperti, F. (2015). An Information Theoretic Criterion for Empirical Validation of Time Series
Models. LEM Papers Series 2015/02, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM),
Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Liu, X. S. (2014). Statistical power analysis for the social and behavioral sciences.New York:
Routledge.
Liu, T., & Stone, C. C. (2007). Law and statistical disorder: Statistical hypothesis test procedures
and the criminal trial analogy. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 887964, Social Science Research
Network, Rochester, NY.
Maggi, E., & Vallino, E. (2016). Understanding urban mobility and the impact of public policies:
The role of the agent-based models. Research in Transportation Economics, 55, 50–59.
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and
accuracy in parameter estimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 537–563.
Mayo, D. G. (1992). Did pearson reject the neyman-pearson philosophy of statistics? Synthese,
90(2), 233–262.
Mungovan, D., Howley, E., & Duggan, J. (2011). The influence of random interactions and
decision heuristics on norm evolution in social networks. Computational and Mathematical
Organization Theory, 17(2), 152–178.
Neyman, J. (1950). First course in probability and statistics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for
purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20A(1/2), 175–240.
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical
hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing
Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 231, 289–337.
Pearson, E. S. (1955). Statistical concepts in the relation to reality. Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society. Series B (Methodological), 17(2), 204–207.
Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2011). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical
introduction (59468th ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ritter, F. E., Schoelles, M. J., Quigley, K. S., & Cousino-Klein, L. (2011). Determining the numbers
of simulation runs: Treating simulations as theories by not sampling their behavior. In L.
Rothrock & S. Narayanan (Eds.), Human-in-the-loop simulations: Methods and practice (pp.
97–116). London: Springer.
Robinson, S. (2014). Simulation. The practice of model development and use (2nd ed.). New York:
Palgrave.
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal
of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612.
Secchi, D. (2015). A case for agent-based model in organizational behavior and team research.
Team Performance Management, 21(1/2), 37–50.