Page 158 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 158

Chapter 6  a n a ly z e   S tag e        139



                             TAble­6.5­ Regression Results for Folded DOE (after Removal of Terms)

                                           Coefficients    Standard    t Stat        p Value
                                                         Error
                             Intercept     	 68.1875     0.670767      101.6559      1.04E	–	17
                             A              –2.4375      0.670767       –3.6339      0.00393
                             B             –14.5625      0.670767      –21.7102      2.21E	–	10
                             C             	 1.5625      0.670767        2.329421    0.03991
                             AB             –6.9375      0.670767      –10.3426      5.27E	–	07




                           analyses were performed by removing BC, then AC, and then finally the block-
                           ing factor (one at a time). The final analysis is shown in Table 6.5. The final
                                    2
                           adjusted R  value is 0.975.
                             The predicted regression model (rounded to the first decimal) is shown in
                           the “Coefficients” column as

                                     Response = 68.2 – 2.4 × A – 14.6 × B + 1.6 × C – 6.9 × A × B

                           This equation can be used to predict the response at any condition within the
                           range of the data by substituting values of factors A, B, and C. The effect of a
                           unit change in any given factor (when all other factors remain constant) is ob-
                           tained directly from the coefficients. For example, an increase of one unit in
                           factor A causes a decrease of 1.4 units in the response.
                             A number of tests can be applied to the residuals (the error between the
                           predicted model and the observed data). Any abnormality of the residuals
                           would be cause for concern about the model. Outliers indicate problems with

                           specific data points, and trends or dependence may indicate issues with the
                             data- collection process as a whole (as discussed in the “Residuals Analysis” sec-
                           tion of Part 3).
                             The factors and their interactions can be analyzed further by breaking down
                           the total error (represented by the residuals) into its components: pure error
                           and lack of fit. Pure error is experimental error, the differences between repeated
                           runs of the same condition. The remaining error is due to a poor fit of the
                           model to the data. Error due to lack of fit is caused by either a curvature in the
                           response surface that is not estimated with the fitted  first- degree model or main
                           factor or interaction effects that were not included in the experiment.
                             The ANOVA for the final model is shown in Table 6.6. The sum of squares
                                                                                  l
                           (SS) residual term (79.1875) includes both pure error and  ack- of- fit (LOF)
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163