Page 174 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 174

Chapter 7  i m p r o v e   S tag e        155



                                   j.  Column J contains the order completion time; for example, row 2 con-
                                   tains the expression “=E2+i2.”
                                   k.  Column K contains the order processing day. Row 1 contains the
                                   value “1”; row 2 contains the expression “=iF(J2>480,K2+1,iF(D3>K2,K2
                                   +1,K2)),” which increments the day count when the order completion
                                   time in column J exceeds 480 minutes or the order arrival day has been
                                   incremented.
                                   l.  Column L contains the order wait time (exclusive of that portion of
                                   waiting owing to incoming calls, which is included in the regression
                                   model), calculated as the difference between the order start time and
                                   arrival time. Row 2 contains the expression “=iF(K2>D2,E2+(480-C2),
                                   E2-C2).”
                                   m.  Column M contains the order cycle time, calculated as the sum of the
                                   process time and the wait time. Row 2 contains the expression “=i2+L2.”
                                 4.  The simulation provided the following information, based on 5,000 simu-
                                   lated trials:
                                   a.  Using the model developed in the designed experiment, the team
                                   verified that the simulation provided a reasonable estimate of the origi-
                                   nal baseline data. Since the baseline data did not include the two main
                                   factors, the team reviewed a subset of the data and, using the records of
                                   the actual orders, noted the number of line items in the order and esti-
                                   mated the call arrival rate using the phone records for the particular date
                                   and time of the order. The model approximated the data fairly well,
                                   based on a residuals analysis. The average process time, including the
                                   wait time associated with incoming calls, was 36 minutes, of which the
                                   actual processing time (excluding the incoming call wait time) was 22
                                   minutes. all orders were processed on the same day, averaging 72 min-

                                   utes of total cycle time, including 35 minutes of wait time not associated
                                   with incoming calls. although this model for the  as- is process will not be
                                   used to estimate the processing time for the suggested process, it will be
                                   used as a baseline to estimate the improvement potential for the sug-
                                   gested process.
                                   b.  Using the design of experiments (DOE) model, the impact of vari-
                                   ous changes in the process inputs can be estimated relative to the
                                   baseline:
                                     (1)  if the order arrival rate increased by 50 percent (from 1 order per
                                   hour to 1.5 orders per hour), the total order cycle time increased 93 per-
                                   cent, with 2 percent of the orders exceeding eight hours.
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179