Page 256 - Steam Turbines Design, Applications, and Rerating
P. 256

Reaction vs. Impulse Type Steam Turbines  235
























                                             Figure 12.14 Inlet section into
                                             nozzle box of a reaction turbine.
                                             (Asea  Brown-Boveri,  Baden,
                                             Switzerland)




            other. This fact was reaffirmed by one of the world’s largest multina-
            tional petrochemical companies whose worldwide affiliates have liber-
            ally applied both impulse as well as reaction steam turbines. Through
            decades of operating experience and collection of applicable failure
            statistics, even the blade failure frequencies assembled by others, and
            seemingly favoring reaction turbines, were put in question. The bottom
            line is simply that thoroughly well-designed steam turbines of either
            type will give highly satisfactory long-term service, while construction
            shortcuts can weaken either type to the point of yielding unacceptable
            performance.


            12.9 Deposit Formation and Turbine
            Water Washing
            Occasions may arise when deposits form on the internal parts of steam
            turbines. The accumulation of these deposits may be indicated by a
            gradual increase in stage pressures over a period of time with no evi-
            dence of vibration, rubbing, or other distress. Such deposits have a
            marked detrimental effect on turbine efficiency and capacity. When
            deposits cause extensive plugging, thrust bearing failure, wheel rub-
            bing, and other serious problems can result.
              Deposits are classified as water insoluble and water soluble. The
            characteristics of the deposits should be determined by analysis of
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261