Page 144 - Structural Steel Designers Handbook AISC, AASHTO, AISI, ASTM, and ASCE-07 Design Standards
P. 144

Brockenbrough_Ch03.qxd  9/29/05  5:05 PM  Page 3.76



                                                        CONNECTIONS


                   3.76  CHAPTER THREE

                                 Additional Checks because of Change in Web Bolt Pattern
                                 Block Shear Rupture

                                              A nv = (7.75 – 2.5 × 1.0) (0.440 × 2) = 4.62 in 2
                                             A gv = 7.75 × 0.440 × 2 = 6.82 in 2
                                              A nt = (3 – 1 × 1.0) × 0.440 = 0.88 in 2
                                            F u A nt = 65 × 0.88 = 57.2 kips
                                         0.6F u A nv = 0.6 × 65 × 4.62 = 180 kips
                                         0.6F y A gv = 0.6 × 50 × 6.82 = 205 kips
                                             U bs = 1.0
                                             φR bs = 0.75[57.2 + min(180, 205)] = 178 kips ≤ 178 kips  OK
                                 Buckling. If this were a nonbearing compression splice, the splice plates would be checked for
                               buckling. The following shows the method, although it is obviously not required for a tension splice.
                                 The plates at the flange splice line are unsupported for a 4.0-in length between bolts. Check for
                               a load of 311/2 = 156 kips/plate. The slenderness ratio is
                                                       Kl
                                                                           =
                                                               ×
                                                            .
                                                                         .
                                                                       /
                                                          = 065 40 × 12 05 180
                                                                 .
                                                                              .
                                                        r
                               Since this value is less than 25, AISC Specification Sec. J4.4 allows the plate to be checked for yield-
                               ing rather than buckling. This limit state has been checked in the preceding calculations, and for the
                               thicker web plates as well.
                   3.6 MOMENT CONNECTIONS
                               The most commonly used moment connection is the field-welded moment connection as shown in
                               Fig. 3.44. This connection is in common use in all regions of the United States, where the Seismic
                               Design Category (SDC) is A, B, or C, and the response modification factor R is 3 or less (AISC,
                               “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings”).

                   3.6.1 Example of Three-Way Moment Connection
                               The moment connection of Fig. 3.44a is termed a three-way moment connection because, in addi-
                               tion to the strong-axis bending, the column is subjected to minor-axis bending from both sides.
                               Additional views are shown in Figs. 3.44b and c. If the strong-axis connection requires stiffeners
                               opposite the beam flanges, there will be an interaction between the flange forces of the strong- and
                               weak-axis beams. If the primary function of these moment connections is to resist lateral maximum
                               load from wind or seismic sources, the interaction can generally be ignored because the maximum
                               lateral loads will act in only one direction at any one time. If the moment connections are used pri-
                               marily to carry gravity loads, such as would be the case when stiff floors with small deflections and
                               high natural frequencies are desired, there will be interaction between the weak- and strong-beam
                               flange forces. The calculations here assume gravity moments in both directions, although much of
                               the procedure is also applicable to wind or low-to-moderate seismic conditions.
                                 The load path through this connection that is usually assumed is that the moment is carried entirely
                               by the flanges, and the shear entirely by the web. This load path has been verified by testing
                               (Huang et al., 1973) and will be the approach used here. Proceeding to the connection design, the
                               strong-axis beam (beam no. 1) will be designed first.




                           Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
                                      Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                                       Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149