Page 128 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 128

116 THE THEORY AND METHOD OF ARTICULATION

                   ARTICULATION IS…: A MOMENT OF ARBITRARY
                                       CLOSURE
            In  order  to  begin  on  some  common  ground,  I  offer  a  few  definitional
            statements, helpful moments of ‘arbitrary closure’. Articulation is

              the  form  of  the  connection  that  can  make  a  unity  of  two  different
              elements,  under  certain  conditions.  It  is  a  linkage  which  is  not
              necessary, determined, absolute and essential for all time. You have
              to  ask,  under  what  circumstances  can  a  connection  be  forged  or
              made? The so-called ‘unity’ of a discourse is really the articulation of
              different,  distinct  elements  which  can  be  rearticulated  in  different
              ways  because  they  have  no  necessary  ‘belongingness’.  The  ‘unity’
              which matters is a linkage between the articulated discourse and the
              social forces with which it can, under certain historical conditions, but
              need not necessarily, be connected.
                                                            (Hall, 1986b:53)

              Articulation  is  the  production  of  identity  on  top  of  differences,  of
              unities  out  of  fragments,  of  structures  across  practices.  Articulation
              links  this  practice  to  that  effect,  this  text  to  that  meaning,  this
              meaning  to  that  reality,  this  experience  to  those  politics.  And  these
              links are themselves articulated into larger structures, etc.
                                                       (Grossberg, 1992; 54)

              The  unity  formed  by  this  combination  or  articulation,  is  always,
              necessarily,  a  ‘complex  structure’:  a  structure  in  which  things  are
              related,  as  much  through  their  differences  as  through  their
              similarities.  This  requires  that  the  mechanisms  which  connect
              dissimilar  features  must  be  shown—since    no   ‘necessary
              correspondence’ or expressive homology can be assumed as given. It
              also  means—since  the  combination  is  a  structure  (an  articulated
              combination)  and  not  a  random  association—that  there  will  be
              structured relations between its parts, i.e., relations of dominance and
              subordination.
                                                           (Hall, 1980d:325)

            Articulation  is  an  ‘old  word’  and  predates  cultural  studies  by  several
            centuries. It has had a variety of dental, medical, biological and enunciative
            meanings.  But  in  every  case,  the  word  suggests  some  kind  of  joining  of
            parts  to  make  a  unity.  Even  the  articulation  of  sounds  or  utterances
            suggests the ‘clinging together’ of notes (Oxford English Dictionary, 1971:
            118).  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  ‘articulation’  is  not  in  Raymond
            Williams’ Keywords (Williams, 1976); it was not a term in the lexicon of
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133