Page 270 - Successful Onboarding
P. 270

Driving Implementation—From Blueprint to Impact • 251


        shows will have a limited impact. This can mean a team might not achieve
        the initial results that will allow for implementation of more important
        and costly program elements over time.
           Booz Allen’s design team emerged from the prioritization process with
        a decision to implement the program in four distinct phases, introducing
        the most critical program elements first and then building on these items
        in the following three phases. The team divided introduction of the four
        pillars across the four phases, designating in each phase whether there
        would be “light,” “medium,” or “heavy” concentration (from a design and
        deployment perspective) on that content area in a given phase. Under this
        model, each deployment would build on the progress of the prior one.
        Assignment of program elements to an earlier or later phase reflected a
        number of considerations, including whether the content area was a steer-
        ing committee mandate, where it resided on the prioritization matrix, and
        whether other elements not yet considered required introduction of this
        particular element first. Light elements were easily deployed foundational
        elements that would meaningfully enhance the current program; medium
        elements were incremental elements that added functionality to the pro-
        gram; whereas heavy elements were final-phase elements that delivered a
        gold-standard onboarding experience and offered the promise of deliver-
        ing the Onboarding Margin.
           In creating a blueprint, teams should proceed to outline specific new
        hire activities, tools, and resources that will support each program phase.
        As further support for the program design, effective blueprint documents
        for any organization development system should include:

           • New program objectives
           • A clear link between the design and current program deficiencies
           • Enhanced program phase elements
           • Expected outcomes
           • An integrated work/build plan (by wave and implementation
             timeline)
           • A governance and operations model (overview and guiding
             principles)
           • Systems and technology requirements
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275