Page 35 - Sumatra Geology, Resources and Tectonic Evolution
P. 35

22                                                CHAPTER 3


            rather  poor  quality  (at  least  in  reproduction),  and  the  boundaries   reGal
            they  recognised  are  sometimes  difficult  to  identify  on  the  better
            quality  sections  obtained  by  the  Scripps  Institution  of  Oceano-
            graphy  (SIO)  on  cruise  RAMA  6.  In  a  more  detailed  analysis   1
            based  on  the  SIO  profiles,  Matson  &  Moore  (1992)  divided
            the  forearc  sediments  into  eleven  sequences,  of which  Sequences
            10 and  11  were roughly  equivalent to Unit 4 of Beaudry & Moore   -5O
            (1985)  and  Sequences  8  and  9  to  Unit  3.  At  deeper  levels  the
            correlation  between  the  two  schemes  is less  clear.
              As well as an increase in detail, Matson & Moore (1992) provided
            a significant new insight into the stratigraphy of the forearc basin by
            distinguishing between the histories of a  'Singkel' and a  'Pini' basin
            east of Nias. Unfortunately, their use of the term Singkel Basin dif-
            fered  from  that  of  earlier  authors  (e.g.  Karig  et  al.  1980),  who
            applied  it  to  a  basin  in  the  Singkel  region  of  mainland  Sumatra.
            The  term  Banyak  Basin  is  used  here  as  a  preferable  alternative.
            The  Pini  Basin  was  considered  to  be  mainly  filled  with  Upper
            Miocene  sediments  but  the  Banyak  Basin  (shown  in  the  inset  to
            Fig.  3.5)  was  interpreted  as  containing  significant  older  section.
            Both  sedimentary  basins  are  associated  with  present-day  sea floor
            depressions  (Fig. 3.5), although the modern and palaeo-depocentres
            do  not  coincide  exactly.  The  division  between  the  two  basins  is
            marked  by  a  gravity  high  offshore  and  by  a  residual  gravity  high
            on Nias (Fig.  3.5).
              On  seismic  sections,  the  most obvious  feature of all the forearc
            sedimentary  basins  is  their  extreme  asymmetry  (see  Karig  et  al.
            1980;  Beaudry  &  Moore  1985;  Matson  &  Moore  1992;  Malod
            &  Kemal  1996).  In  the  Banyak  Basin  (Fig.  3.5,  inset),  a  Middle
            Miocene  shelf has  been  tilted  seawards  and  is  now  buried  under
            younger  sediments  that  increase  in  thickness  up  to  the  east  coast   Fig. 3.6. Interpretation of a gravity profile across the forearc basin and Sunda
            of  Nias,  where  sediments  as  old  as  Oligocene  are  exposed   Trench south of Nias, after Kieckhefer  et al.  (1981). White and black inverted
            (Samuel  &  Harbury  1995).  The  sharp  flexure  at  the  western   triangles show the locations of controls on depth provided by, respectively,
            edge  of  the  basins  can  be  identified  with  the  Mentawai  Fault   unreversed and reversed seismic refraction profiles. Densities on blocks in the
            (see  Chapter  2)  and  on  the  regional  gravity  map  (Fig.  3.1)  is   model are in Mg m -3. Unlabelled blocks are sediments or m61ange with densities
            associated  with  a  steep  gravity  gradient  that  is,  in  fact,  rather   between 2.0 and 2.4 Mg m -3. The differences between the calculated and
            less  pronounced  near  Nias  than  elsewhere.  Where,  SE  of   observed curves are too small to be apparent at the scale of the figure. Profile
            Enggano,  the  fault  moves  away  from  the  flank  of  the  forearc   location shown as a yellow line on Figure 3.1.
            ridge  and  towards  the  centre  of the  forearc  basin  (Schltiter  et  al.
            2002),  this  gradient  largely  disappears.
              Despite the high gravity fields, both  geological  mapping  (Samuel   most  reliably  estimated  from  perturbations  of  satellite  orbits.  A
            &  Harbury  1995)  and  gravity  modelling  (Kieckhefer  et  al.  1981)   number  of  models  have  now  been  produced  that  integrate  the
            indicate  that  the  material  forming  the  forearc  ridge  is  of generally   results  obtained  by  this  method  with  results  from  conventional
            low  density  (Fig.  3.6).  The  high  fields  are  produced  by  the  thin   surface  gravity  surveys  and  satellite  altimetry  to  define  global
            crust  and  the  high  density  subducted  slab,  and by the  large  density   gravity  anomalies  with  half-wavelengths  greater  than  about
            contrast  between  even  the  lightest  rocks  and  water.  Onshore   400 km.  The  sources  of  these  anomalies  are  likely  to  lie  deep
            mapping  and  offshore  seismic  reflection  lines  all  suggest that  large   within  the  mantle,  because  the  isostatic  equilibrium  prevailing  in
            volumes  of  sediments  deposited  in  the  forearc  basin  have  been   the  Earth's  outermost  layers  implies  approximate  cancellation  of
            incorporated  into  the  forearc  islands.  Only  on  Simeulue,  where  a   the  gravity  fields  from  shallower  mass  differences.  Controversy
            small  ophiolite  is  associated  with  a  local  gravity  high  (Fig.  3.2,   about  the  origin  of mass  anomalies  within  the  mantle  has  existed
            inset)  is  there  evidence  for  the  presence  of  coherent  masses  of   for  decades.  A  rough  correlation  between  geoidal  highs  and
            oceanic  rocks beneath  the ridge  (Milsom  et  al.  1991).   plate  convergence  zones  has  long  been  recognized  (cf.  Hagar
              Gravity  provides  few  constraints  on  the  nature  of  the  crust   1984)  but  has  appeared  unconvincing  in  detail.  If,  however,
            beneath  the  forearc  basin.  In  one  of  the  two  alternative  models   using  the  same  basic  data,  field  strength  (the  differential  of
            of  Kieckhefer  et  al.  (1981)  the  basin  is  underlain  by  m61ange   potential)  is  contoured  rather  than  potential  itself,  the  longest
            and  in  the  other  (reproduced  here  in  slightly  modified  form  as   wavelengths  are  suppressed  and  the  correlation  with  subduction
            Fig.  3.6)  by  continental  crust.  In both  models  the  forearc  ridge  is   becomes  very  striking  (Milsom  &  Rocchi  1998).  Major  highs
            underlain  by  m61ange,  and  both  produce  acceptable  fits  with  the   can  be  seen  to  the  rear  of  almost  all  long-lived  subduction
            gravity  profile  along  the  modelled  line.  As  far  as  the  Mentawai   zones,  and  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that  the  mass  excesses
            Fault  is  concerned,  it  is  not  the  gravity  data  but  the  extreme   are  associated  with  the  subducting  slabs.  Since  these  slabs
            linearity  that  suggests  its  location  has  been  determined  by  the   are  sinking  through  the  less  dense  asthenosphere,  isostatic
            position  of  the  former  continental  margin  rather  than  by  the   considerations  do  not  apply.
            boundary  between  two  belts  of m61ange.                One of the most widely used of the long-wavelength (400 km§
                                                                    gravity models is GEM-T3  (Lerch  et  al.  1994), which is complete
                                                                    to  spherical  harmonics  of  degree  and  order  50.  The  GEM-T3
            Seismic tomography and the long-wavelength              map  of  the  Borneo-Sumatra  region  (Fig.  3.1,  inset)  shows  a
            gravity field                                           distribution  of  long-wavelength  gravity  highs  consistent  with
                                                                    hypothesized  patterns  of past  subduction.  In  eastern  Borneo  and
            Despite  significant  recent  advances  in  the  measurement  of  the   Sulawesi,  geological  mapping  has  defined  former  subduction
            Earth's  gravity  field,  the  long  wavelength  variations  are  still   traces,  marked  by  m~lange  and  ophiolites,  that  indicate  that  a
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40