Page 95 -
P. 95

62     Part 1  •  SyStemS analySiS FundamentalS



                                              CONSULTING OPPORTUNITY 3.2



                                      Veni, Vidi, Vendi, or, “I Came, I Saw, I Sold”



                “It’s really some choice. I mean, no single package seems to   could all be chosen by Roman numerals. It was easy to follow.
                have everything we want. Some of them come darn close, though,”   And the vendor isn’t going to be hard to move on price. I think
                says Roman, an advertising executive for Empire Magazine with   they’re already in a price war.”
                whom you have been working on a systems project. Recently,   “Do you want to know my favorite, though?” Roman asks
                the two of you have decided that packaged software would prob-  archly. “It’s the one put out by Jupiter, Unlimited. I mean, it
                ably suit the advertising department’s needs and stem its general   has everything, doesn’t it? It costs a little extra coin, but it
                decline.                                               does what we need it to do, and the documentation is heav-
                   “The last guy’s demo we saw—you know, the one who worked   enly. They don’t do any training, of course. They think they’re
                for Data Coliseum—really had a well-rounded pitch. And I like   above it.”
                their brochure. Full-color printing, on card stock. Classic,” Roman   You are already plotting that to answer Roman’s burning
                asserts. “And what about those people from Vesta Systems?   questions by your March 15 deadline, you need to evaluate
                They’re really fired up. And their package was easy to use with a   the software as well as the vendors, systematically, and then
                minimum of ceremony. Besides, they said they would train all 12   render a decision. Evaluate each vendor and package based on
                of us, on-site, at no charge. But look at their advertising. They just   what Roman has said so far. (Assume that you can trust his
                take things off their printers.”                       opinions.) What are Roman’s apparent biases when evaluating
                   Roman fiddles in his chair as he continues his ad hoc review   software and vendors? What further information do you need
                of software and software vendors. “That one package from Mars,   about each company and its software before you can make a
                Inc., really sold me all on its own, though. I mean, it had a built-  selection? Set up a table to evaluate each vendor. Answer each
                in calendar. And I like the way the menus for the screen displays   question in a separate paragraph.





                                         the organization you are designing the system for is unlikely to undergo major changes after the
                                         proposed purchase of COTS software, such as a dramatic increase in customers or large physical
                                         expansions.
                                             There are some advantages to purchasing COTS software that you should keep in mind
                                         as you weigh alternatives. One advantage is that these products have been refined through the
                                         process of commercial use and distribution so that often there are additional functionalities
                                         offered. Another advantage is that packaged software is typically extensively tested and thus
                                         extremely reliable.
                                             Increased functionality is often offered with COTS software because a commercial product
                                         is likely to have sister products, add-on features, and upgrades that enhance its attractiveness.
                                         Additionally, analysts often find that the initial cost of COTS software is lower than the cost for
                                         either in-house software development or the use of a SaaS provider.
                                             Another advantage of purchasing COTS packages is that many other companies use them,
                                         so analysts are not experimenting on their clients with one-of-a-kind software applications.
                                         Finally, COTS software boasts an advantage in the help and training that accompanies the pur-
                                         chase of the packaged software.
                                             One example of the use of COTS software is from a theatre company in the nonprofit
                                         sector, in which organizations (particularly in the performing arts) tend to lag behind their
                                         for-profit counterparts in adoption of information communication technologies (ICTs). The
                                         theatre company was predictably slow to move to the Web. When the company wanted to
                                         create ecommerce applications, it was put in a position of having to hire outside designers to
                                         create ecommerce applications for them. In light of the expense and lack of in-house expertise,
                                         many nonprofit organizations simply did not move the business portion of their organizations
                                         to the Web; instead, they waited for COTS packages, such as PC-based box office software
                                         or SaaS, such as online ticketing agencies with automation already in place, to make these
                                         services available to patrons. In-house, custom software development was out of the question
                                         for most of these groups, which typically have small or nonexistent IT staffs and budgets and
                                         minimal internal IT expertise.
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100