Page 908 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 908

0066_Frame_C30  Page 19  Thursday, January 10, 2002  4:43 PM









                                                         KS Frequency Response
                                   35


                                   30


                                   25

                                   20
                                   Mag (dB)

                                   15


                                   10


                                    5

                                    0
                                     −2           −1            0            1             2
                                    10           10            10           10           10
                                                          Frequency (rad/sec)
                                   2
                       FIGURE 30.5  H  Design KS frequency response.
                                                   Complementary Sensitivity Frequency Response
                                    10
                                    0

                                   −10
                                   −20

                                   −30
                                   Mag (dB)  −40


                                   −50

                                   −60

                                   −70
                                   −80

                                   −90
                                                   −1           0            1            2
                                                 10            10           10           10
                                                          Frequency (rad/sec)
                                   2
                       FIGURE 30.6  H  Design complementary sensitivity frequency response.
                       Example 30.3 (LQG/LTR Design for First Order Unstable Missile Model)
                       We consider an unstable missile described by a simple first order model with state x (pitch attitude),
                       control input u (fin elevator deflection), process noise w I  = x (angular wind gust), and sensor noise w 2  = θ.
                         It is assumed that the missile’s center of gravity (c.g.) is aft of its center of pressure (c.p.)—where lift
                       is concentrated. This assumption results in a missile pitch instability. It is also assumed that the missile’s


                       ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913