Page 151 - Bird R.B. Transport phenomena
P. 151

§4.4  Flow near Solid  Surfaces by Boundary-Layer  Theory  135

                                  2
                                                  1
                                             1
                 This  suggests  that d v /dx 2  «  d v /dy ,  so that the  former  may be safely  neglected. In
                                               x
                                   x
                 the boundary  layer  it is expected  that the terms on the left  side  of Eq. 4.4-2  should be  of
                 the same order of magnitude as those on the right side, and  therefore
                                         '^1   or  ^  = O | J ^ |  = O[-|=j           (4.4-7)
                 The second  of these relations shows that the boundary-layer  thickness is small  compared
                 to the dimensions  of the submerged  object in high-Reynolds-number  flows.
                     Similarly  it can be shown,  with  the help  of Eq. 4.4-7, that three of the derivatives in
                 Eq. 4.4-3 are of the same order of magnitude:
                                                                     2
                                       dv xl  dv u  d\   /Vs \      d v u
                                                            n
                                         J                  o  u
                                          -     -    - ^   ~    -  -                  (4.4-8)
                 Comparison  of this  result  with  Eq. 4.4-6  shows  that d^/dy «  d^/dx.  This  means that
                 the y-component of the equation of motion is not needed and that the modified  pressure
                 can be treated as a function  of x alone.
                     As  a  result  of  these  order-of-magnitude  arguments,  we are left  with  the  Prandtl
                 boundary  layer equations: 1
                                                 dv   dv y
                                                   1
                 (continuity)                    -г-  + —  = 0                        (4.4-9)
                                                 dx  dy
                                                         1  d°P  d V Y
                                                                  2
                 (motion)                v  -^  + v, -г± = -± ^f  + v — \            (4.4-10)
                                                  dv y
                                           dV Y
                                          x  dx  XJ  dy  P dx   dy 1
                 The modified  pressure  2P(x) is presumed  known  from  the solution  of the corresponding
                 potential-flow  problem or from  experimental measurements.
                     The usual boundary  conditions for these equations are the no-slip  condition (v  = 0
                                                                                       x
                 at у  = 0), the condition  of no mass  transfer  from  the wall  {v  = 0 at у  = 0), and  the
                                                                       y
                 statement  that  the velocity  merges  into  the external  (potential-flow)  velocity  at the
                 outer  edge  of the boundary  layer  (v (x, y) —> v (x)). The function  v {x) is related to &(х)
                                                x        e               e
                 according to the potential-flow  equation of motion in Eq. 4.3-5. Consequently  the term
                 -(l/p)W97dx)  in Eq. 4.4-10 can be replaced by v (dv /dx)  for steady flow. Thus Eq. 4.4-10
                                                          e  e
                 may also be written as
                                                                 2
                                           dv x    dv x   dv e  d v x
                                         v ——h   Pw^— = v -— + v—-                   (4.4-11)
                                                         e
                                          x
                                            dx   У dy     dx    dy 2
                 The  equation  of continuity may be solved  for v  by using  the boundary  condition that
                                                          y
                 Vy = 0 at у = 0 (i.e., no mass  transfer), and then this expression  for v  may be substituted
                                                                          y
                 into Eq. 4.4-11 to give
                                             (       \               2
                                       dV x   ГУ dV x  J  dV x  dv c  d V x
                                                    *J dy
                                      л  dx x  f \J I  dx x  j . . \  r  _ „ e  dx с  ,  _. dy 2 x  (4.4-12)
                                               0
                 This is a partial differential  equation for the single dependent variable v .
                                                                             x
                     1  Ludwig  Prandtl (1875-1953) (pronounced  "Prahn-t'D, who taught in Hannover and Gottingen and
                 later served as the Director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Fluid Dynamics, was one of the people
                 who shaped the future  of his field at the beginning of the twentieth century; he made contributions to
                 turbulent flow and heat transfer, but his development of the boundary-layer equations was his crowning
                 achievement. L. Prandtl, Verhandlungen des III Internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses (Heidelberg, 1904),
                 Leipzig, pp. 484-491; L. Prandtl, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1961), pp. 575-584.
                 For an introductory discussion of matched asymptotic expressions, see D. J. Acheson, Elementary Fluid
                 Mechanics/'  Oxford  University Press (1990), pp. 269-271. An exhaustive discussion of the subject may be
                 found  in M. Van Dyke, Perturbation Methods in Fluid Dynamics, The Parabolic Press, Stanford, Cal. (1975).
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156