Page 306 - Trenchless Technology Piping Installation and Inspection
P. 306

270    Cha pte r  S i x


                  Frictional drag due to soil weight/pressure in collapsed borehole

                                                      Length, L
                    Tension, T                           Drag (lb)

                                                         Drag (lb)

                                                Coefficient of friction, ν
                           Pressure, P
                                      Pipe circumference, C
          FIGURE 6.22  Replacement pipe pulled through collapsed borehole.



          subjecting the pipe to pressure from the soil at the top and its sides, as
          illustrated in Fig. 6.22. A conservative estimate may, therefore, assume
          that the borehole collapses along the entire length of the bore. Fur-
          thermore, the “prism load” corresponding to the height of soil above
          the pipe may conservatively be used to estimate the local radial soil
          pressure applied around the circumference, C. Thus, the reconsidered
          required tension, T , would now be given by
                          2
                             T  = γ × d × C × L × ν             (6.3)
                              2
          where d = depth of cover above the pipe (in.)
               C = pipe outer circumference (in.)
                γ = soil density (lb/ft .)
                                 3
             As mentioned before, it is a relatively simple matter to apply
          Eq. (6.3) to the 4-in. HDPE pipe considered previously. In this case,
          however, a segment length of only 100 ft, as well as a relatively
          shallow depth of 5 ft, is considered, corresponding to that which
          should be a readily accomplished installation, based on Table 6.1.
          For the present calculations, a relatively low value of soil density
          (γ equal to 100 lb/ft ) and frictional coefficient (ν equal to 0.3) are
                           3
          assumed, the latter possibly corresponding to the use of lubricant,
          such as bentonite. The calculation results in a drag force exceeding
          17,500 lb, more than four times the 4000 safe pull strength provided
          in Table 6.2, for a DR 17 HDPE pipe. This broad inconsistency
          between actual field capabilities and the theoretical predictions
          confirms the degree of excessive conservatism reflected in Eq. (6.3),
          due to the assumed extent and magnitude of the applied soil loads
          for typical applications.
             Consistent with the widely varying assumptions reflected in
          Eqs. (6.2) and (6.3), as directly related to the degree of stability of the
          created cavity, the corresponding required tensile forces—and
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311