Page 111 - Tunable Lasers Handbook
P. 111

92       Charles Freed


                      Additional precautionary measures  should be  taken  in using the  saturated
                  fluorescence signal. The Einstein coefficient for the upper lasing level (0001) is
                  about 200 to 300 sec-1  and. therefore, the modulation frequency must be  slow
                  enough so that the molecules in the upper level have enough time to fluoresce
                  down to the ground state; here radiation trapping [82,83] of the 4.3-~m sponta-
                  neous emission (because CO,  is a ground-state absorber) will show up as a vari-
                  ation of  the  relative phase  between  the  reference modulation  and  the  fluores-
                  cence signal as the pressure is vaned. The phase lag between the reference signal
                  and  the  molecular response  would  increase  as  the  pressure  increases  because
                  there are more molecules to trap the 4.3-ym radiation and, therefore, hinder the
                  response.  This  phase  lag  will  increase  with  increasing  modulation  frequency,
                  since the molecules will have less time to respond; thus, caution must be taken
                  when selecting the modulation frequency. A large phase lag will reduce the out-
                  put voltage (feedback signal) of the phase-sensitive detector; however, it will not
                  cause a shift in the instrumental zero [76].
                      In addition to optimizing the frequency at which to modulate the laser, the
                  amplitude of the modulation (the frequency excursion due to the dithering) was
                  also considered in the experiments at Lincoln Laboratory [76]. The modulation
                  amplitude must be large enough such that the fluorescence signal is detectable,
                  but the amplitude must be kept reasonably small to avoid all unnecessary para-
                  sitic amplitude modulation  and nonlinearities in  the piezoelectric  response. in
                  order to avoid distorting the 4.3-pm Lorentzian. The maximum derivative signal
                  is  obtained  if  the peak-to-peak frequency excursion equals 0.7 FWHM of  the
                  Lorentzian. But such a large excursion should be avoided in order to minimize
                  the  likelihood  of  introducing  asymmetries in  the derivative  signal. A compro-
                  mise modulation amplitude based on obtaining sufficient SNR for most J  lines
                  was used. This modulation amplitude corresponded to a frequency deviation of
                  approximately 300 kHz peak-to-peak on a Lorentzian with an FWHM of about 1
                  MHz. Experimental results  indicated that the modulation frequency  should be
                  kept well below  500 Hz. At such low frequencies, InSb photovoltaic detectors
                  may have very high  llfnoise unless operated at effectively zero dc bias voltage.
                  This may be best accomplished by a low-noise current mode preamplifier that is
                  matched to the dynamic impedance of  the detector and is adjusted as close as
                  possible to zero dc bias across the detector (preferably less than 0.001 V).
                      There are other advantages of the 4.3-pm fluorescence stabilization; because
                   the fluorescence lifetime is long compared to the reorientating collision time at
                   the pressures typically employed in the measurements, the angular distribution
                   of  the spontaneous emission is nearly isotropic. This reduces distortions of  the
                   lineshape due to laser beam imperfections. Furthermore, only a relatively short
                   (3- to 6-cm) fluorescing region is monitored, and the CO,  absorption coefficient
                   is quite  small (-10-6  cm-1-Torr-1);  this  eliminates laser beam focusing effects
                   due to the spatial variation of the refractive index of  the absorbing medium pro-
                   duced by  the Gaussian laser beam  profiles  [84,85].  Indeed, we have found no
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116