Page 108 - Using ANSYS for Finite Element Analysis Dynamic, Probabilistic, Design and Heat Transfer Analysis
P. 108

probabilistic Design analysis   •   95
                           questions: If we have 1,000 components that are operated under
                           real-life conditions, what would the lowest load value be that only
                           one of these 1,000 components is subjected to and all others have
                           a higher load? What would the most likely load value be, that is,
                           the value that most of these 1,000 components have (or are very
                           close to)? What would the highest load value be that only one of the
                           1,000 components is subjected to and all others have a lower load?
                           To be safe you should ask these questions not only of the person
                           who provided the nominal value, but also to one or more experts
                           who are familiar with how your products are operated under real-
                           life conditions. From all the answers you get, you can then consol-
                           idate what the minimum, the most likely, and the maximum value
                           probably is. As verification you can compare this picture with the
                           nominal value that you would use for a deterministic analysis. If the
                           nominal value does not have a conservative bias to it then it should
                           be close to the most likely value. If the nominal value includes a
                           conservative assumption (is biased), then its value is probably close
                           to the maximum value. Finally, you can use a triangular distribution
                           using the minimum, most likely, and maximum values obtained.
                        •  If the load parameter  is generated  by a computer  program then
                           the more accurate procedure is to consider a probabilistic analysis
                           using this computer program as the solver mechanism. Use a prob-
                           abilistic design technique on that computer program to assess what
                           the scatter of the output parameters are, and apply that data as input
                           to a subsequent analysis. In other words, first run a probabilistic
                           analysis to generate an output range, and then use that output range
                           as input for a subsequent probabilistic analysis.



                      3.3.4  ChooSing RAnDoM oUTPUT PARAMeTeRS

                      Output parameters are usually parameters such as length, thickness, diam-
                      eter, or model coordinates. The ANSYS PDS does not restrict you with
                      regard to the number of RPs, provided that the total number of probabi-
                      listic design variables (i.e., RVs and RPs together) does not exceed 5,000.
                          ANSYS recommends that you include all output parameters that you
                      can think of and that might be useful to you. The additional computing
                      time required to handle more RPs is marginal when compared to the time
                      required to solve the problem. It is better to define RPs that you might not
                      consider important before you start the analysis. If you forgot to include
                      a random output parameter that later turns out to be important, you must
                      redo the entire analysis.
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113