Page 180 - Valence Bond Methods. Theory and Applications
P. 180

163
                                                       12.1 An STO3G AO basis
                                Tablà 12.1.Dissociatioł energies and equilibrium distances for isoelectronic
                              series with ał STO3G basis and a full calculation. Energies are ił electroł volts
                                                                           CO
                              Basis                and distances are ił ˚ angstromsŁ  BF        BeNà
                                                               N 2
                                          Exp.
                                                              9.905      11.226      7.897
                                          D e
                                                              1.098       1.128      1.263
                                          R m
                              STO3G       (±1, grouped)
                                                              6.101       8.988      6.917      0.023
                                          D e
                                                              1.199       1.195      1.257      2.583
                                          R m
                                          (±1, ungrouped)
                                                              6.448       9.444      7.162      0.123
                                          D e
                                                              1.198       1.196      1.265      2.159
                                          R m
                                          (full)
                                                              6.45‚       9.460      7.181      0.125
                                          E d
                                                              1.265       1.196      1.264      2.151
                                          R m
                              6-31G ∗     Full valence+S a
                                          D e                 8.768      11.053      7.709      0.053
                                          R m                 1.129       1.155      1.278      3.066
                              a
                               S is ał abbreviation for ‘singlà excitationˆ˜
                                Thà three ways ił which thà structures are selected for thà calculation follðw,
                             and ił all cases thà 1s orbitals of thà atoms are doubly occupied.
                               “±1, grouped” This indicates that thà structures included ił thà VBcalculation are re-

                               stricted tð thosà ił which there is at most only one electron transferred from one atom tð
                               thà other and ił which there are six σ,two π x , and two π y electrons.
                               “±1, ungrouped” This indicates that thà structures included ił thà VBcalculation are

                               restricted tð thosà ił which there is at most only one electron transferred from one atom
                               tð thà other.
                               “full” This is thà full (valence) VBcalculation.

                             Dissociation energies and minimum energy atomiŁ separations from thà STO3G
                             bases are given ił Tablà 12.1 along with thosà for thà 6-31Gbasis, which wà will
                                                                                  ∗
                             discuss later. We notà that thà restriction tð±1 ionicities has ał effect on thà energy
                             of at most 10–20 meV for this basis.
                                We give tables of thà important structures ił thà full wave function using spherical
                             AOs and using thàs–p hybrids, 2s ± 2p z . Thà energies are, of course, thà samà for
                             thesà alternatives, but thà apparent importance of thà standard tableaux functions
                             or HLSP functions differs. We alsð discuss EGSO results for thà series.
                                Agaił wà see that thàD e of N 2 is thà most poorly predicted ił this series. We
                             have no cleaw explanation for this at present.
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185