Page 530 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 530

CAT3525_C15.qxd  1/27/2005  12:40 PM  Page 501
                       Incineration of Hazardous Wastes                                            501
                       baghouses. The removal of acid gases is accomplished using technologies identical to those for
                       MSW incinerators (see Chapter 9). For example, wet scrubbers and packed-tower absorbers are
                       highly effective for the condensation and removal of HCl and SO .
                                                                           x
                          Most hazardous waste incinerator facilities employ one of three possible schemes for overall air
                       pollution control:

                           ● Venturi scrubber (for particulates) followed by a packed tower absorber (for gases)
                           ● Ionizing wet scrubber (for particulates) combined with a packed tower absorber (for
                             gases)
                           ● Dry scrubber (for particulates) followed by a baghouse or an electrostatic precipitator
                             (for particulates).


                       EXAMPLE 15.4
                       A hazardous waste incinerator is operating for the destruction of a mixed nonchlorinated solvent
                       waste. The flue gas is passed through a lime (CaO) slurry in a dry scrubber where acid gases are
                       partially neutralized and the gases cooled. The gases then pass through a baghouse for particulate
                       removal and are released via the flue.
                       The flue gas contains 410 kg/h of SO and 325 kg/h of HCl. The dry scrubber lime feed rate is
                                                      2
                       1.2   stoichiometric rate, and it is 75% efficient in removing SO and 88% efficient in HCl
                                                                               2
                       removal.
                         1.  Calculate the lime feed rate in kg/h.
                         2. Determine how many kg/h of SO and HCl will remain in the flue gas following the dry
                                                       2
                             scrubbing process.
                             Assume that CO in the flue gas does not react with the lime.
                                          2
                             CaO   SO → CaSO  3
                                      2
                             CaO   2HCl → CaCl   H O
                                               2
                                                   2
                             (MWs: CaO   56; SO   64; HCl   36.5)
                                               2
                       SOLUTION
                          410 kg/h per 64 kg/mol          6.4 mol/h SO in flue gas
                                                                     2
                          325 lb/h per 36.5 kg/mol        6.71 mol/h HCl in flue gas
                          SO requires 6.4 mol/h CaO   1.2    7.68 mol/h
                            2
                          HCl requires 6.71 mol/h CaO   1.2    8.05 mol/h
                          Total CaO required              15.73 mol/h

                         1. Total lime usage   15.7 mol/h   56 kg/mol   879.2 kg/h
                         2. 0.25   410 kg/h   103 kg/h SO in flue gas
                                                       2
                             0.12   245 kg/h   29 kg/h HCl in flue gas
                          Note. Further treatment of this flue gas to remove additional acid gases is warranted.


                       REFERENCES

                       Brunner, C.D., Hazardous Waste Incineration, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1993.
                       Brunner, C.D., Incineration Systems: Selection and Design, Incinerator Consultants, Inc., Reston, VA, 1988.
   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535