Page 539 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 539

CAT3525_C16.qxd  1/27/2005  12:42 PM  Page 510
                       510                       Waste Management Practices: Municipal, Hazardous, and Industrial
                       Converting mg/L of Cu to mol/L of Cu,
                             2
                          [Cu ]   (0.50 mg/L)/[(63.54 g/mol)(1000 mg/g)]   7.87   10  6  mol/L
                       The solubility product equation above is rearranged to solve for the hydroxide concentration.
                               2
                                                        6
                          [OH ]   (2.0   10  19 )/(7.87   10 )   2.54   10  14

                                              )
                          [OH ]   (2.54   10  14 1/2
                                  1.59   10  7
                                                 7
                            pOH   log (1.59   10 )
                                  6.80
                             pH   14 – pOH
                                  14 – 6.8
                                  7.20
                       Thus, the pH should be set to 7.20 to remove the soluble copper to 0.5 mg/L.
                          The neutralization of alkaline waste is achieved by reaction with an adequate quantity of an acid
                       to bring the solution pH to within the desired range. Methods of neutralizing alkaline wastes include
                       (Haas and Vamos, 1995):

                           ● Adding appropriate amounts of strong or weak acid to the waste
                           ● Adding compressed carbon dioxide gas to the waste
                           ● Blowing acidic flue gas (e.g., from coal combustion or municipal solid waste [MSW]
                             incineration) through the waste
                           ● Mixing the alkaline waste with an acidic waste
                          Alkaline wastes are most commonly neutralized by reaction with mineral acids, typically sulfu-
                       ric and hydrochloric acid. Sulfuric acid is popular by virtue of its relatively low cost. Neutralization
                       residence times of 15 to 30 min. are recommended with sulfuric acid (Wilk et al., 1988; Haas and
                       Vamos, 1995). A disadvantage of using sulfuric acid is that it will form sludges when reacted with
                       calcium-containing alkaline wastes.
                          Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is more expensive than sulfuric acid; however, HCl neutralization will
                       not produce sludges when neutralizing calcium-containing alkaline wastes. Neutralization reaction
                       residence times of 5 to 20 min. are recommended with HCl (Wilk et al., 1988; Haas and Vamos,
                       1995). A disadvantage of using HCl is that it can form a corrosive and irritating acid mist upon reac-
                       tion. Nitric acid (HNO ) may also be used for neutralization; however, it is dangerous because it is
                                         3
                       a powerful oxidizing agent.
                       16.3.2 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION

                       During the chemical precipitation of hazardous waste streams, a soluble hazardous species is
                       removed from the solution by the addition of a precipitating reagent; an insoluble compound sub-
                       sequently forms that contains the hazardous constituents (Equation 16.2).  The precipitate is
                       removed from the solution using a physical separation technique such as sedimentation or filtration.
                       Coagulants or flocculants may be added to the mixture to enhance the separation of the precipitate
                       from the soluble phase. Examples of common inorganic coagulants are aluminum sulfate (alum),
                       (Al (SO ) ·18H O) and ferric sulfate (Fe (SO ) )
                                                           4 3
                                                       2
                             4 3
                         2
                                   2
                          A schematic of a typical precipitation process is provided in Figure 16.3.
                          Precipitation processes are typically geared toward the removal of dissolved inorganic ions, par-
                       ticularly metals:


                                      Cd 2   (aq)   HS (aq) → CdS(s)   H (aq)                    (16.2)
   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544