Page 51 - Water Loss Control
P. 51

What is Necessary to Contr ol the W ater Loss Pr oblem?    33


                    and costlier due to enhanced water quality and environmental protections, coupled
                    with funding constraints. Despite these pressures, water loss policy is still not ade-
                    quately addressed at the national level even though the water saved through reduction
                    of water loss represents one of the least expensive new sources of water.
                       The term water accountability has been used casually in the United States for the last
                    several decades to label a variety of activities that impact the delivery efficiency of water
                    utilities. Historically in the United States, water accountability practices (unaccounted-
                    for water percentages) have existed more as art than science, with methods often
                    generating as much confusion as explanation in interpreting water loss  conditions.
                    Symptomatically, this confusion stemmed  from
                    inconsistent terminology, unreliable percentage
                    measures, and a lack of procedures to rationally   No consistent national meth-
                    evaluate and compare water loss performance. On a   ods are employed in the United
                    broader level; however, outdated water account-
                                                                  States to quantify water loss
                    ability methods are a weak discipline due to the lack
                    of awareness of the extent of water loss occurring in   accurately—however, there are
                                                                  strong signs of change in a
                    the United States. Lacking recognition is a signifi-
                    cant concern for many water industry stakeholders,   number of state and regional
                    no national agenda exists for water utilities to reli-  governments!
                    ably quantify or control their losses.
                       Conversely, the field of water conservation has become a well-structured discipline in
                    a number of states; achieving considerable success in limiting unnecessary water con-
                    sumption; particularly in the dry regions of the country where significant population
                    growth is occurring and water is both limited and expensive. Water conservation
                    focuses largely on water reductions by the end user by improving usage efficiency and
                    reducing waste. It has achieved recognition at the
                    national level with legislation in place that sets
                    requirements for household water appliances and
                    other water uses. The National Alliance for Water  The success of many water
                    Efficiency is launching, with the support of the   conservation efforts in the
                    United States Environmental Protection  Agency   United States sets the stage
                    (USEPA), a multitude of successful regional water   for improved structures to
                    conservation efforts on a national scale. USEPA has   motivate water loss control;
                    also recently launched its WaterSense Program and
                                                                  particularly since water loss
                    water appliances are sold with a WaterSense label,
                    just as appliances have carried an EnergyStar energy   management offers the ability
                                                                  to supplement conservation
                    efficiency rating for many years. Unfortunately,
                    supply side losses occurring due to leakage and   savings many times over with
                    poor accounting by water utilities are often many   the often high volume savings
                    times greater than the end-user savings achieved   potential of water loss recovery.
                    through conservation; yet are still not adequately
                    recognized.

                    4.2.1 Cultural Attitudes
                                                                       2
                    Americans are the world’s consumers. As shown in Fig. 4.1,  their water consumption
                    ranks them as the world’s highest per capita water users, when assessing source water
                    withdrawals for all uses: including the majority uses of power generation and agricul-
                    ture, in addition to drinking water supply. The authors would like to mention that the
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56